Listen, before anyone jumps to conclusions about this topic, I would like to first notice that “this is not about homosexuals or homosexuality.” I’m past that dispute because it is meaningless, at least to me. This is about the psychology of the “slow walk down.” The “baby steps” to nowhere. The incorporated video evidences how the social controllers, when they want to accomplish a goal, they “slow walk” the people wherever they are needed. This can be compared to the “slow boil” of the frogs. By turning up the heat a degree at a time the frog never feels itself being cooked.
I have covered this topic before from the “other angle,” and for those so inclined, that musing of nothingness is here:
See, the “slow walk” is not alone. It forms the foundation of the social control, however it is overlayed with sundry “fast shocking events” to bolster whatever position that the “slow walk” is promoting. “Sometimes the people need a “giddy up.” Or an incentive of some sort. An incentive that will scare, confound weak minds and sow confusion. Those are the best kinds. Not only are they the best kinds but they are getting harder to stage and fake, “The internet is ruining it for them.” Thus one can see the thrust of online “influencers” pumping nothingness in desperate attempt to generate consent for whatever foreign project currently being plotted upon. The sense of urgency is manifest.
Effectiveness of Indoctrination Methods
“The effectiveness of indoctrination can greatly depend on various factors, including the context, the beliefs being instilled, and the individuals involved. Two primary methods—**slow acclimation** and **fast shocking change**—each have their strengths and weaknesses.”
**Slow Acclimation**
- Easier for individuals to accept gradual change
- Allows time for critical thinking and adjustment
- Builds a sense of community and shared experiences
- Takes longer to achieve desired outcomes
- May lead to resistance at any stage
- Can be undermined by external influences
**Fast Shocking Change**
- Immediate effect; can rapidly shift beliefs
-Creates a strong emotional response that may embed ideas deeply
- Less time for questioning or dissent
- Can lead to backlash and resistance
- May create fear and anxiety, hindering acceptance
- Often superficial, lacking deep understanding
Slow Acclimation
Characteristics
This method involves gradually introducing new ideas or beliefs. It often includes repeated exposure, education, and fostering discussions that lead to a natural shift in perspective.
Advantages
**Acceptance:** People may find it easier to accept gradual changes since they can adjust their thinking incrementally.
**Community Building:** As people share experiences of change, a deeper sense of community can form.
**Reflection:** Individuals are given time to reflect and may internalize beliefs more fully.
Disadvantages
**Time-Consuming:** This approach requires patience and commitment, which may not always be feasible.
**Risk of Resistance:** If individuals feel overwhelmed at any point, they might reject the change altogether.
Fast Shocking Change
Characteristics
This method involves abrupt and significant shifts in beliefs or behaviors. It might be initiated by dramatic events or high-pressure situations that demand an immediate response.
Advantages
**Rapid Impact:** This approach can create swift changes in a group’s beliefs, especially in crises.
**Emotional Engagement:** Strong emotional reactions can make people more amenable to accepting new beliefs.
**Overpowering Dissent:** By minimizing time for debate, dissent can be reduced significantly.
Disadvantages
**Potential Backlash:** People may react negatively, becoming defensive or resistant to change.
**Surface-Level Acceptance:** Changes made in this manner may not be deeply rooted, as understanding may be sacrificed for speed.
**Psychological Effects:** The shock may create fear, hindering long-term acceptance and mental wellbeing.
“In conclusion, the choice between a slow acclimation and a fast shocking change method depends on the goals of the indoctrination, the audience, and the sociocultural context. Slow methods may promote more sustainable changes, while fast methods can be effective in urgent situations but come with higher risks of resistance and emotional fallout.”
See, it does not matter what direction. The social controllers figured out a long time ago that people can be lead just about anywhere if they are slow walked, “People just won’t move if rushed, unless they are scared.” They also learned that if a man or woman could be manipulated in their sexuality, they could be manipulated anywhere. Think about it? A person being manipulated “in their private parts,” and desires, over time until they capitulate into behaviors “that they would not normally do” absent indoctrination. Think about the level of manipulation in the “base desires?” Think about the level of control? Think about how broken as a species we must be to accept it?
Think about how much damage that can do to an impressionable child’s mind? Think about how behaviors can be altered? Think about the damage the “slow walk can do?” Or has done?
While the people, “think about it,” the social controllers already have, manifestly, and the hoof prints of such are obvious.
Lord have Mercy
