American Indian or Israelite?

More Tomfoolery

RED ALERT, RED ALERT, RED ALERT, another hijacking is being attempted by the disciples of evil, the ones that play “long range,” as in “generations.” This caper, this attempt to defraud the public, amongst the plethora of other frauds, revolves around somehow, some way, anyway, connecting themselves to the American Indian, and his land, to the Babylonian, Messianic fables, myths, lies and allegories of the Middle East. Why? So the practitioners of that cult can lie, deceive and steal more land and wealth. That’s why. It’s just another hijack of a culture that has a payday at the end.

Why ain’t no dirty, filthy, homeless, fentanyl, heroin addicted dope fiends of Mumbai, or Karachi, or Kensington the lost tribes? Or a bunch of nappy headed cannibals? Or the Bedouins living in a sandbox with no natural resources? Why are they not “the lost tribes?” Because there is no material gain in assuming their identity. Only the names and identities of “revenue streams” are allowed. Thus the attempt to “NOW BECOME AMERICAN INDIANS.” The evil ones want the land and identities.

AMER'ICAN, adjective Pertaining to America.

AMER'ICAN, noun A native of America; originally applied to the aboriginals, or copper-colored races, found here by the Europeans; but now applied to the descendants of Europeans born in America.

https://webstersdictionary1828.com/Dictionary/american

Now the hijack, in order to be comprehended, one must recognize the “twist.” The term “American,” was hijacked from its original usage and now means someone “born in the Americas.” The hijack takes place in the term “NATIVE AMERICAN.” When this term is used people automatically associate it with “Indians of the Americas.” This is not true. Anyone given “nativity,” or born in the Americas is a “Native American.” A European or Asian born in the Americas is “Native American.”

“Native American,” is not a federally recognized term. There is no Bureau of “Native American” Affairs. It is Bureau of Indian Affairs. We have a federal issued BIA card that is titled, “Certificate of Indian Blood.” Not the of certificate of “Native American.”

“American Indian or Alaska Native. A person having origins in any of the ORIGINAL PEOPLES of North and South America (including Central America), and who MAINTAINS tribal affiliation or community attachment.” 

(58789) Federal Register / Vol. 62, No. 210 / Thursday, October 30, 1997 / Notices. 

“OMB accepts the following recommendation concerning changing the term ‘‘American Indian’’ to ‘‘Native American’’: The term “American Indian” should not be changed to Native American.” (58786)id. 

Additionally, there is a difference in the “Indians” from the First Nations, the Bering Straight crossers, and the American Indians of the states united. The First Nations people have pronounced Mongol traditions, garb and blood lines. The “Indians” of the lower Americas don’t. Many of them, including, but not limited to “Plains Indians” are semi-nomadic, whereas our tribes lived in built houses.

The “look” between the two groups “originally” is distinctly different and over time it has become an amalgam of hues and cultures.

Now. let’s dissect the Messianic “fantasy” that presents itself instantly. Please note, it is rather clever in its presentation, however it fails on many points.

“In the 8th century BCE, the Assyrians dispersed the Kingdom of Israel, giving life and legend to the Lost Tribes. The repatriation of these lost tribes eventually became an integral part of the Jewish–and Christian–messianic dream, and there have been Lost Tribe speculations about numerous “discovered” populations. One the most fascinating — and unfortunately forgotten — such discussions centered on the Native Americans. How did American Jews respond to this? Why and how did Jews credit or discredit it? What did these theories signify about American Jewish agendas and anxieties?”

“One of the first books to suggest the Native American Lost Tribe theory was written by a Jew, the Dutch rabbi, scholar, and diplomat Manasseh ben Israel. In The Hope of Israel (1650), Ben Israel suggested that the discovery of the Native Americans, a surviving remnant of the Assyrian exile, was a sign heralding the messianic era. Just one year later, Thomas Thorowgood published his best seller Jewes in America, Or, Probabilities that those Indians are Judaical, made more probable by some Additionals to the former Conjectures. The Lost Tribe idea found favor among early American notables, including Cotton Mather (the influential English minister), Elias Boudinot (the New Jersey lawyer who was one of the leaders of the American Revolution), and the Quaker leader William Penn.”

“The notion was revived after James Adair, a 40-year veteran Indian trader and meticulous chronicler of the Israelitish features of Native American religion and social custom wrote The History of the American Indians…Containing an Account of their Origin, Language, Manners, Religion and Civil Customs in 1775. Even Epaphras Jones, an American Bible professor engaged the theory in 1831, claiming that anyone “conversant with the European Jews and the Aborigines of America… will perceive a great likeness in color, features, hair, aptness to cunning, dispositions for roving, &s.”

“Some of these writers were interested in Native American history, but most of them were just interested in the Bible. Indeed, the Lost Tribe claim should be seen as part of a general 19th-century fascination with biblical history. Explorations of Holy Land flora and fauna, the geography of the Holy Land, the life of Jesus-the-man, were very much en vogue. A close identification among some 17th and 18th century Americans with the chosen people of Scripture helped Christian settlers see their colonization of New England as a reenactment of Israel’s journey into the Promised Land.”

[This is why Plymouth colony was officially called, “The Hebrew Republic or Massachusetts.”]

“To cite just one example, in a 1799 Thanksgiving Day sermon, Abiel Tabbot told his congregation in Massachusetts:

“It has often been remarked that the people of the United States come nearer to a parallel with Ancient Israel, than any other nation upon the globe. Hence, ‘OUR AMERICAN ISRAEL,’ is a term frequently used; and common consent allows it apt and proper.”

A curious incident that drew considerable attention and “proved,” at least to some, that Native Americans had ancient Israelite origins unfolded when tefillin (phylacteries) were “discovered” in Pittsfield, Massachusetts in the early 19th century. Their discoverer wrote that this “forms another link in the evidence by which our Indians are identified with the ancient Jews, who were scattered upon the face of the globe, and to this day remain a living monument, to verify and establish the eternal truths of Scripture.”

[Again, the ‘ole “artifact” swindle. Anytime the evil ones want to link themselves to a land, they “season” or bury some “artifact” to be later dug up. This I believe.]

“Around the time of the Pittsfield incident, Mordecai Manuel Noah, the journalist, playwright, politician, and Jewish American statesman, began spilling ink about the subject. Noah wrote a play She Would be a Soldier; or, The Plains of Chippewa (1819), that resolved the tension between the Yankees and the British by identifying the Indian Great Spirit with the God of the Bible. Noah’s ideas about Jewish-Native affinities grew in a distinctly political manner when he invited Natives Americans to help settle “Ararat,” the separatist Jewish colony he hoped to establish on Grand Island on the Niagara River around 1825.”

“Noah’s writings on Jewish Natives came to their full expression with his Discourse on the Evidences of the American Indians Being the Descendants of the Lost Tribes of Israel (1837). The work documented a host of theological, linguistic, ritual, dietary, and political parallels between Jews and Native Americans. Most importantly, he identified several essential character traits shared by the two peoples, all of which were, of course, highly laudable. For Noah, the conflation of Indians and Jews sanctioned the latter as divinely ordained Americans.”

[Well, this “theory’ can be debunked right here. Our people share no dietary parallels with Israelites. Our people are from the swamps, bayous, rivers and gulf ocean, and traditionally they ate everything forbidden to Jews. Shrimp, musk rats, rodents, shell fish, crabs, etc., all forbidden in kosher laws.]

“Another notable Jewish-Indian incident occurred in 1860, when stones hewn with Hebrew inscriptions were found near Newark, Ohio. The story unfolded over the course of many months and was followed closely by The Israelite, The Occident, and The Jewish Messenger, whose respective editors represented the intellectual vanguard of American Jewry. Isaac Mayer Wise, the leader of the Reform movement in America, employed philological proofs to undermine the stone’s authenticity. He rejected any connections between Jews and Native Americans, though it’s notable that he bothered to engage the story at all. Isaac Leeser, a traditionalist, sided in favor of the Lost Tribes theory. Reviewing the relics in question, The Occident, Leeser’s newspaper, concluded, “The sons of Jacob were walking on the soil of Ohio many centuries before the birth of Columbus.”"

https://www.myjewishlearning.com/article/native-americans-jews-the-lost-tribes-episode/

Now, let’s examine exactly “what” all of this “religious” tomfoolery means. It means nothing because it is based in contradictions and impossibilities. The following video explains that according to the bible the realm is only 6000 years old.

Long before 6000 years ago, the time of the biblical narrative, the American continent was accessed via the land bridge across the Bearing straight. Approximately 40 thousand years according to what modern science believes.

So, 34,000 years before the Book of Genesis, the American continent was inhabited. What “religion” were the inhabitants? Did they know of Moses or Jesus or anyone associated with the biblical narrative? What about Jacob? Did they know about him? What about a Jew, Christian or Muslim? Buddha? What about the Hindu traditions? I mean, they call Hindus, “Indians,” right? A bit of simple math unveils a “gaping hole” in the “theory.” Abrahamic “religions” came after American Indians.

Another fascinating aspect of this attempted hijack is the whole dogma that people are attempting to align themselves with. The whole concept of “religion” as espoused in the tradition of “Jacob, or Israel” is rooted in manifest fraud. It says it right in the book itself. Rebekah and Jacob “stole” or defrauded Esau out of his birthright. In law everything from that point forward is fraud. Jacob, after kidnapping Labans daughters and stealing his idols [precious metals], he fled [consciousness of guilt] and changed his name to Israel [ To throw off the trail, I believe.] All crimes.

How can there be a foundation of fraud and one expect something else to arise from it? It can’t. Then, when this is coupled with the history of documented enormities that have been associated with this Messianic doctrine, one has to question sincerely its validity. “You can tell a tree by the fruit it bears, right?”

The American Indians never had a “holy book.” We never had a tablet of laws to teach us how to act. We never needed it. We never needed a “promised land,” because The Most High gave us our own. We never needed a messiah. We never needed anything, because All Mighty God created us with everything, and now we need everything because “religion” has left us with nothing. The same “religion” started by Jacob. The same “religion” infiltrating and hijacking it all. “It’s prophesy,” they banter.

“A mind is a terrible thing to waste.”

Lord have Mercy