Church Imposition
Reflection
After a long bit of reflection I decided to chronicle one of the many reasons why I believe religion has been inverted and changed into something evil. The reason I believe such is not because of my own mind, but rather what history has evidenced.
Throughout history there is a pattern of abuses, enormities and atrocities directly associated with, and connected to people and institutions that claim some sort of religion. Without exception. Even the so called, “Atheists,” their religion is “godlessness.” On both sides of that coin there is a dogma. The religious fanatics have their doctrine and the “non-believers” have theirs.
The godless have an excuse for their evil. I mean, they let people know “up front” where thy stand, and so people expect a certain type of character or personality that comes with such a classification. The “excuse” for the godless is in our expectation. We have been conditioned to expect evil from certain groups, and so we accept their evil. We excuse it. We chalk it up to their godlessness.
On the other side is the phony, fake, fraudulent, cleric. The “pretend pious,” who cloak themselves in sundry religious traditions and utilize such as a shield to conceal their manifest devilment. This is where the child abusers, the murderers, the thieves and the rapist house themselves. They pretend to be pious, meanwhile they are as treacherous and sociopathic as any modern serial killer today. They just secrete themselves in religious garb, religious regalia, religious groups and religious “anything.”
These “religious people,” if they can be called that, are responsible for countless atrocities and genocides throughout history, and during such they professed to be representing some sort of “god.” They weren’t, but a different “entity” than most people believed. One can go back in see what history has evidenced and documented to support this position.
Disclaimer: Don’t watch this video, unless you must. It graphically depicts and accurately depicts some aspects of past “enormities and atrocities” that were committed by the church and people in the name of their “god.” If I may describe the contents…
It depicts a church “officiated” judgement of people during the Spanish Inquisition. It depicts official church policy. It depicts burning people alive. It depicts evil. It evidences that no “god” could possibly be involved with the church or the individuals involved. It evidences “the devil” as being the head of this outfit.
It was the church that destroyed the American Indian. It was the church that had sundry boarding schools established to traffic, sexually exploit and harm our children. Not just our children on this land, but children on every land where this “religion,” and others were present.
The evildoers even produced propaganda films to conceal their crimes. This was done to present to the public the image of “something wholesome,” when in reality it was just an extension of the “age old” trafficking matrix that had been happening since 1492. Let’s be clear, from “gate one” the Spanish and Portuguese were trafficking in our women and children. Especially the children. So when viewing any information about “Indian Schools,” know with certitude, that is a code for what has been described herein, to wit, “Trafficking operations.”
Propaganda was one thing, the reality was quite different. The reality evidences AGAIN, that “religion” is a dangerous detriment to society, and especially to American Indian and Negro society. After all the colonizers came and traded us a bible and religion in exchange for our women, children, lands and souls. History has never evidenced religion benefitting anything but itself and it’s disciples of evil.
Religion needs to be removed from society as in, “Separation of Church and State.” Religion should be personal and private, not public policy or publicly funded. Such is not the situation in Oklahoma, a state with a large American Indian population. Even now, the same kooks are trying to inculcate our people into their Messianic fanatism and “End Times” delusion. American Indians don’t want the realm destroyed and all the people killed so the messiah can come back and enslave everyone else. This is the belief system that the Messianic extremists in Oklahoma want. We were here long before the “Ten Commandments” were ever issued or the Hammurabi Codes which the Ten Commandments were plagiarized from.
“The Code of Hammurabi is one of the oldest and most complete written legal codes, created around 1755–1750 BC in ancient Babylon. It consists of nearly 300 laws covering various aspects of society, including property, commerce, family, and criminal matters, and is known for its principle of "an eye for an eye" regarding justice.”
We had “religion” long before “civilization” by colonists, however we must now drop that “way of life” and adopt “codes” from a different land, different tribes, different values, manifestly, and different blood? Strange. The new policy is just a continuation of the old evil, except now the purpose is to inculcate Messianic religious fanaticism into the minds of a new generation. This is mind washing. There is a psychology behind it.
The psychology is simple, to wit “Believe in one thing and accept the rest as a matter of course.” I mean, believe in the basic principle and then accept the “add ons.” The Messianic “add ons.” You know, the whole phony “12 tribes, promised land, chosen, end times, rapture delusional madness.” This is why they are forcing the bible on children. They want the children under the same spell and same Messianic supervisors. They want “another go at it.”
Below are two reports that have been A.I generated by me after an extensive investigation into this topic. There has been additional emphasis placed upon one aspect of the phenomena, and that is this whole entire concept of being “chosen.” The whole concept is nuts. If one were to based being “chosen” on historical deeds and actions, then it would be only rational to deduce they were being chosen for their “deficiencies” not for their “sterling character.”
Standalone Summary Report: Psychological and Societal Risks of Group Superiority Myths with Focus on the 'Chosen' Narrative
Executive Summary
This report summarizes the psychological, ethical, legal, and societal consequences of belief systems rooted in inherent group superiority, with special focus on the comparative effects of the 'Chosen' doctrine. Such ideologies—regardless of their origins—result in distorted reasoning, exclusionary behavior, and systemic inequality. The 'Chosen' narrative, in particular, is shown to amplify these risks by framing supremacy in sacred or mythic terms.
1. Summary of Psychological Effects
Group superiority beliefs manifest in collective narcissism, cognitive dissonance, and projection. These traits fuel a closed mindset, resistance to evidence, and moral rigidity. The 'Chosen' variant intensifies these symptoms by embedding them in a transcendent mandate, leading to greater resistance to correction and deeper identity entrenchment.
2. Summary of Behavioral and Moral Consequences
Such ideologies promote moral inversion—where harmful actions are justified as good when committed by the in-group. Obedience to mythic authority displaces ethical reasoning. The 'Chosen' model frames moral exemptions as divine favor, fostering an environment where cruelty or exclusion is sanctified.
3. Summary of Sociocultural Dysfunction
Supremacist beliefs fracture social cohesion, distort historical education, and suppress dissent. They discourage empathy and hinder multicultural integration. In the 'Chosen' framework, these effects are normalized through identity formation that equates group loyalty with moral truth.
4. Summary of Legal and Institutional Threats
Ideologies of group superiority compromise the rule of law, enforce biased legal standards, and institutionalize discrimination. The 'Chosen' belief system legitimizes unequal treatment by framing it as cosmically ordained, threatening both secular governance and human rights norms.
5. Summary of Apocalyptic and Destructive Worldviews
These ideologies often include fatalistic or exterminationist visions of the future, where destruction is necessary to fulfill a group’s destiny. The 'Chosen' doctrine often aligns with end-times beliefs that sanction mass suffering or collapse as spiritually redemptive.
6. Summary of Deficiencies by Domain
Psychology: Supremacist ideologies are grounded in narcissistic delusions and projection. The ‘Chosen’ doctrine intensifies these by tying them to sacred identity, making correction or critical reflection extremely difficult. Believers often exhibit rigid closed-mindedness and a belief in group infallibility.
Ethics: Both systems invert moral reasoning. Harm becomes justifiable when perpetrated by the in-group. The ‘Chosen’ narrative elevates this to divine moral authority, portraying unethical behavior as righteous if aligned with a perceived higher calling.
Society: Such ideologies cause systemic division, indoctrinate new generations into exclusionary beliefs, and foster antagonism. The ‘Chosen’ variant embeds this in national myths and identity, discouraging diversity and pluralism.
Law: Supremacist frameworks erode legal equality by granting privileges based on identity. The ‘Chosen’ doctrine sanctifies this bias as destiny or divine justice, threatening constitutional fairness and human rights principles.
Politics: Political systems influenced by supremacist myths develop hierarchies based on ethnicity or affiliation. The ‘Chosen’ view institutionalizes this through narratives of divine governance, fueling authoritarian and theocratic tendencies.
Environment: Supremacist ideologies neglect long-term sustainability. The ‘Chosen’ doctrine compounds this by promoting apocalyptic fatalism, where global collapse is seen as necessary for renewal or salvation, thus undermining ecological and humanitarian responsibilities.
7. Comparative Summary: Supremacist Ideologies vs. the ‘Chosen’ Doctrine
While general supremacist ideologies claim group superiority on secular grounds, the 'Chosen' doctrine does so through metaphysical authority, making it more resistant to reform and more socially acceptable. Its psychological impacts are more severe, its moral defenses more entrenched, and its legal justifications more dangerous. It functions as a cultural mechanism for rationalizing inequality and erasing empathy under the guise of divine purpose.
8. Summary of Conclusions
Supremacist delusions—especially when cloaked in sacred language—pose a direct threat to ethical reasoning, legal integrity, and civic cohesion. The 'Chosen' doctrine stands as a particularly enduring and destructive form of such delusion, normalizing exclusion and conflict in the name of transcendence. Combating such ideologies requires coordinated educational, legal, and psychological strategies.
9. Summary of Policy Recommendations
Promote education rooted in critical thinking and historical accuracy.
Foster civic values based on shared dignity and mutual accountability.
Codify legal safeguards against institutionalized supremacy.
Address collective delusion through public mental health initiatives.
References (APA Style)
Altemeyer, B. (1996). The Authoritarian Specter. Harvard University Press.
Fromm, E. (1941). Escape from Freedom. Farrar & Rinehart.
Lifton, R. J. (1989). Thought Reform and the Psychology of Totalism. UNC Press.
Kruglanski, A. W., & Orehek, E. (2011). The psychology of closed-mindedness. Psychology Press.
Staub, E. (1989). The Roots of Evil: The Origins of Genocide and Other Group Violence. Cambridge University Press. (finis)
///
Title: Policy Brief – Scriptural Authority, Legal Harm, and the Necessity of Secular Ethical Safeguards
Issued By: Interdisciplinary Review Body JBG for Scriptural Ethics and Accountability
Purpose: To advise policymakers, educators, and legal authorities on the risk of scriptural texts being interpreted or applied in ways that violate civil, human, and constitutional rights.
Executive Overview:
This policy brief expands upon findings from The Bible Reframed report, which examined biblical narratives and doctrines through the lens of modern law, clinical psychology, and historical precedent. The evidence indicates that literal or doctrinal use of scripture—particularly in governance, education, and judicial application—has historically enabled violations of human rights, ethical codes, and public safety.
I. Key Findings:
1. Legal Risk:
Numerous biblical injunctions conflict with constitutional protections, including due process, freedom of speech, and equal protection under law (e.g., Leviticus 20:13, Deuteronomy 22:28–29).
Use of scripture in state policy risks violating international humanitarian and civil rights agreements such as the UDHR, CEDAW, and ICCPR.
2. Psychological Harm:
Doctrines such as eternal damnation, divine punishment, and unworthiness foster Religious Trauma Syndrome (RTS), mirroring symptoms of PTSD, anxiety disorders, and moral injury.
Religious fundamentalism correlates with authoritarianism, rigid in-group morality, and suppression of dissent.
3. Historical Precedent:
Scriptural authority was central in justifying colonization, the transatlantic slave trade, apartheid, witch trials, and gendered violence.
Biblical references were used to enact laws that legalized genocide (e.g., Doctrine of Discovery) and sanctioned the suppression of Indigenous, and Black peoples.
4. Educational and Judicial Concerns:
Inclusion of uncritical scriptural materials in public schools can violate the Establishment Clause (First Amendment).
Courts invoking scripture risk breaching the separation of church and state and undermining secular jurisprudence.
II. Policy Recommendations:
1. Secular Safeguards:
Enforce strict separation of religious doctrine from public law and policy.
Ban the citation of scripture as legal precedent in state or federal court proceedings.
2. Educational Reform:
Limit religious curriculum in public schools to critical, literary, or historical contexts.
Introduce trauma-informed religious studies to reduce psychological harm.
3. Ethical Oversight:
Establish independent review panels to assess the ethical impact of religious language in policy and legislation.
Protect vulnerable populations from scripturally sanctioned discrimination.
4. Legal Accountability:
Recognize historical harms justified by scripture as actionable under reparative justice and truth commissions.
Require public disclaimers when scripture is used to guide policy discourse.
5. Public Health Integration:
Fund mental health research and treatment for religious trauma and spiritual abuse.
Train clinicians to recognize religious indoctrination and moral injury as clinical risk factors.
III. Religious Trauma Syndrome (RTS): A Public Health Concern
Definition:
Religious Trauma Syndrome is a recognized cluster of symptoms experienced by individuals who have left authoritarian, dogmatic, or coercive religious environments. The term was developed by psychologist Dr. Marlene Winell and aligns with components of PTSD, C-PTSD, anxiety disorders, and moral injury.
Diagnostic Features:
Intrusive thoughts of eternal punishment or divine surveillance
Chronic guilt, fear of judgment, and shame-based identity
Dissociative states, cognitive dissonance, and sleep disturbances
Suicidal ideation linked to perceived spiritual failure
Clinical Correlates:
Shared symptomology with victims of cult abuse and intimate partner coercion
Often co-occurs with post-religious deconstruction, trauma, and familial alienation
Social Consequences:
Educational gaps due to fear-based anti-science teachings
Distrust in secular institutions and medical care
Increased vulnerability to authoritarian political ideologies
Legal and Ethical Implications:
Failure to address RTS in public mental health systems may violate ethical principles of informed consent and nonmaleficence
Public systems that accommodate religious indoctrination without safeguards risk compounding psychological injury
Recommendations:
Recognize RTS as a legitimate clinical concern in DSM-related training and trauma research
Develop therapeutic protocols specific to RTS (e.g., trauma-informed spiritual care, cognitive restructuring)
Require oversight when religious institutions access public education or healthcare systems
Key References:
Winell, M. (2011). Leaving the Fold: A Guide for Former Fundamentalists and Others Leaving Their Religion
Herman, J. (1992). Trauma and Recovery
American Psychiatric Association. DSM-5-TR (2022)
Exline, J.J. et al. (2014). Religious and spiritual struggles as predictors of mental health
IV. Legal and Scholarly Support:
Key References:
UDHR (1948), ICCPR (1966), Rome Statute (1998), Geneva Conventions (1949)
U.S. Constitution: First, Eighth, and Fourteenth Amendments
APA DSM-5-TR (2022); Herman, Trauma and Recovery (1992); Shay, Achilles in Vietnam (1994)
Historical case law: Johnson v. M’Intosh (1823), Engel v. Vitale (1962), Brown v. Buhman (2013)
V. Closing Statement:
Religious texts must be reclassified as cultural and moral literature—not legal authority. Policymakers, educators, and the judiciary must adopt protective frameworks to prevent the misuse of sacred texts in ways that endanger life, liberty, and dignity. A future-oriented, inclusive, and secular legal structure is essential to counterbalance the historic and ongoing harms justified by scripture. (finis)
On a personal level I do resent what “religion” has done to my own people and innocent people in general. Our people always believed in “One God,” and we danced to such, long before the biblical narrative was ever conceived. We never needed a “written book” to guide us, nor did we ever need a savior. Religious people came to this land and convinced us that we did, and while convincing us they were plotting on our demise. History evidences that truth.
See, history evidences all good and evil. For example, in modern society there is a system to document a person’s financial credit worthiness. That is a credit report. A credit report “looks back” at spending habits, payment history, number of accounts and sundry other factors to decide whether a person is “credit worthy.” If a “credit report” was done on religion “looking back” at “actual deeds and real actions,” then the report would not present well for religion. I’m talking about a 499 credit score. A score without consideration.
Somebody said, “The Kingdom of All Mighty God is within you.” I concur 100%, and it always has been, that is why “religion” has been “at us so tough.” Religion wants that gone.
Lord have Mercy
Have always dream of Churches "Decomposition" !!!! Like the Bible...A fantasy talk for 3,000 years And keep in mind Religion and religious people don't like to play nice