GET WHITEY!!!!!!

I despise racism. Towards anyone of any race. I know, people probably would believe that I would harbor evil towards people who don’t look like me, especially being American Indian and “that whole ugly history with our people on this land.” Nope. I never harbor bitterness because ONLY I CAN FEEL IT. Nobody gives a “f” about me being bitter, sad, glad or mad. Period. So why would I harbor something that would ONLY EFFECT ME, and not the object to the bitterness? That’s retarded.

See, being from a “truly mixed” family bloodline on this land, I have people from Europe in my family ancestry. France, primarily, but also the Kingdom of Naples, and England. My family has, right now, people of all hues and skin tones in it. American Indians, Irish, Mulattos, etc. So growing up I was never exposed to racism. Except from the police. They hated us. For real. Real race based animus, not “T.V.” racism, or “keyboard racism,” but “life or death type of racism.” I wrote about this in a past book.

“There is a psychology to all of this, one that the social controllers are well aware of, yet somehow no one pays attention to. Is it negligence, or is it deliberate? It's been happening for generations, “let history be the judge.” There is no aspect of society that has not been thoroughly “gamed out,” generations ahead of time. There is too much at stake for it to be any other way, and only the naive, silly people believe otherwise. There is a conference for every contingency, and this goes on, year after year, while the populace marinates in useless nothings on the smartphone, tablet or computer. Useless musings of imbecility, in conjunction with cognitive dissociation from reality, specifically designed to filter the eyes and scrub the mind.”

“It is during this state of hypnosis that the population is injected with all manner of subliminal messages via the media, internet and other vectors, that has kept in the minds of the population the image of the “nigger.” This has been going on since the social controllers figured out that they could brainwash people via vaudeville shows, books, products, and in real life. I cover this in my book entitled, “The Photo Book of Shame.” In this book I show the exact mechanisms utilized, in photos, to keep the image of the nigger alive in the minds of the people. It is the same way when we fast forward to 2020, nothing has changed. After generations of brainwashing, and with the help of Rappers, the image of the nigger has never left, and one byproduct of this entire generational indoctrination is found in the way that others perceive so called, “Blacks.” Police make it very clear how they perceive us.

“I remember the first time that I was ever called a, “ Fuckin' Nigger” by a person in a position of authority or otherwise. I was standing on the corner of Florence and Van Ness by the Louisiana Chicken franchise. I was standing on the bus stop right out in front, and a Los Angeles Police Dept., 77th Division, car swooped up. Out jumps this Blond White cop with blue eyes and cigarette breath. He walks up to me, pulls out his Smith and Wesson .38 caliber, 6 inch blue steel revolver from his swivel, nazi style holster, and he growls, “Where is Lamont?”

“I said, “Who?' It was at that point that he walked up to me closer, put his gun in my face and stated, “You Fuckin' Nigger, where is Lamont, I will kill you?” He spit when he talked and his sandy blond mustache was inches away from my face. I remember his lips were shaking he was so full of rage. He was looking at me with those stone cold blue eyes and I believed in my heart that if that man would have caught me somewhere, he was capable of killing me without any remorse. I knew in that second that he was a psychopath, I had seen that look in my uncles eyes.”

“I again stated that I did not know who Lamont was, and the other cop, who was on the radio, motioned for the officer to come closer to him. The officer pointed at me and said, “Kneel down on the curb, lock your hands behind your head, and cross your legs behind you.” I was all of 14, and I complied. The two officers stood there talking while I knelt there with my knees aching. After what seemed like an eternity of them standing there talking, the officer who pointed his gun at me patted my pockets and told me to go home. I did.”

“Knowing what I know now, about the psychology and the total brainwashing, it becomes clear that the generations of brainwashing or indoctrination has created in the minds of people, and especially police, people who carry guns, a false perception of what so called, “Black” people are. These indoctrinated falsehoods has created a dangerous situation in the policing community, and when these indoctrinated biases are coupled with foreign military training for police departments, then it is a recipe for disaster. Police are being trained to look upon average people as threats and this foreign training when coupled with the intergenerational “nigger” brainwashing creates an entire institution that it not designed to serve the community, but because of perception and indoctrination, “police it.”

"Black men tend to be stereotyped as threatening and, as a result, may be disproportionately targeted by police even when unarmed. Here, we found evidence that biased perceptions of young Black men’s physical size may play a role in this process. The results of 7 studies showed that people have a bias to perceive you- ng Black men as bigger (taller, heavier, more muscular) and more physically threatening (stronger, more capable of harm) than young White men. Both bottom-up cues of racial prototypicality and top-down information about race supported these misperceptions. Furthermore, this racial bias persisted even among a target sample from whom upper-body strength was controlled (suggesting that racial differences in formidability judgments are a product of bias rather than accuracy). Biased formidability judgments in turn promoted participants’ justifications of hypothetical use of force against Black suspects of crime. Thus, perceivers appear to integrate multiple pieces of information to ultimately conclude that young Black men are more physically threatening than young White men, believing that they must therefore be controlled using more aggressive measures.”

“A long history of psychological research has found that, compared with Whites, Black people are subject to automatic negative stereotypes and prejudice (Devine, 1989). Beyond broad negativity, however, stereotypes of Blacks, and particularly young Black men, often focus on violence, threat, and crime. For example, Black men are more likely than White men to be misremembered as carrying a weapon (Allport & Postman, 1947), are more likely to facilitate the visual recognition of a weapon (Payne, 2001), are more likely to be shot mistakenly in a virtual crime scenario while holding an innocent object such as a soda can (Correll et al., 2002 ; Correll, Wittenbrink, Park, Judd, & Goyle, 2011; cf. James, Vila, & Daratha, 2013), and are more likely to activate concepts related to crime (Eberhardt, Goff, Purdie, & Davies, 2004).”

“In ambiguous contexts, Black men are more likely than White men to be seen as threatening or aggressive (e.g., Duncan, 1976; Hugenberg & Bodenhausen, 2003, 2004; Sagar & Schofield, 1980). Indeed, representations of Black individuals, and particularly young Black men, in popular media reliably depict them as aggressors (e.g., Dixon & Linz, 2000; Chiricos & Eschholz, 2002), and these representations have real implications for intergroup relations (Johnson, Trawalter, & Dovidio, 2000). For instance, the physical features associated with African Americans activate race-related stereotypes regardless of the target’s actual race (Blair, Judd, Sadler, & Jenkins, 2002), leading to consequences as severe as exacerbated criminal sentences and even execution (Blair, Judd, & Chapleau, 2004; Eberhardt, Davies, Purdie-Vaughns, & Johnson, Although such research has established the role of race and race-signifying features in signaling the stereotype of Black men as dangerous in the minds of Whites, few studies have directly linked race to perceptions of physical size and formidability.”

“Indeed, much of this research (though certainly not all—see Blair et al., 2002) has focused on the connection between race and stereotypes in broad and general terms, with little attention to biased perceptions of the targets’ actual threat-relevant physical characteristics. Such knowledge is critical for understanding decisions to engage in physical force against a potentially dangerous person. For example, in the police shootings of unarmed Black civilians described above, police officers decided to shoot based on a subjective perception that their lives were in danger. This perception would be consistent with the assessment that a “reasonable” officer witnessing the incident would believe the action to be justified, a criterion required among law enforcement agents before they may use lethal force (Klinger & Brunson, 2009). In many instances, this is relatively clear—a suspect brandishes a weapon in the direction of police. But in other cases, such as that involving Dontre Hamilton, the officer relies on a qualitative assessment of the target’s physical size and strength to gauge the magnitude of threat and the need for force.”

“These circumstances are more ambiguous and, thus, more susceptible to errors resulting from systematic biases." Across a range of different stimuli and dependent variables, perceivers showed a consistent and strong bias to perceive young Black men as larger and more capable of harm than young White men (at least among non-Black participants). Such perceptions may have disturbing consequences for how both civilians and law enforcement personnel perceive and behave toward Black individuals. The studies reported here serve as a clear demonstration of this important phenomenon and provide theoretically meaningful knowledge about both feature-based and category-based influences on the bias to misperceive Black men as larger and more threatening. We hope that stakeholders are able to apply this information to formulate interventions that can meaningfully reduce these biases in the future."

Racial Bias in Judgments of Physical Size and Formidability: From Size to Threat- John Paul Wilson Montclair State University Kurt Hugenberg Miami University Nicholas O. Rule University of Toronto

https://www.apa.org/pubs/journals/releases/psp-pspi0000092.pdf

Race Based Animus, Jean Baptiste Guillory, Lulu Books 2019. [Out of print]

Now, what does all of this “Nigger stuff” have to do with “Whitey?” EVERYTHING. See, in the past the evil wrong doers had a plot. A sinister plot whereby they could assume a position of control over the population, but first the population had to be divided and pitted against each other. The plot had to be tested, and it had to be “tuned and honed” into a “perfect mechanism” that would help assist the evil wrong doers in their insidious, demonic plots. The “mechanism” was first “beta-tested” upon American Indians, Negros, and poor immigrant “Whites.” That mechanism is called, “racism and discrimination.”

After generations of literal “hard core” beta-testing on “minorities,” now the “mechanism” is ready for “Whitey.” The mechanism was readied during the Obama Administration and pushed forward from there.

Now, the shoe is on the other foot. “The Other Foot Syndrome,” it is called. What was once utilized as a means to justify the destruction of a people in the past has been updated and realigned with a new target set. The fight is now on. I mean, now that another administration has taken control of the states united, they have an agenda that is the anthesis of the “Get Whitey Agenda,” however, there are huge numbers of “stay behind” moles and “plants” all over the states united and realm at large. They won’t go quietly. They never have.

This is why the war is on. The information war of opinion. The war of racism, masquerading as “news, print, and social media.” History evidences this fact.

Lord have Mercy