Open Warfare II
Pro Deo et Iustitia? Pro Ordine?
There is another battle going on while the people gawked at the “latest conflict” in the “ever-conflicted Middle East.” That is the battle that some feel is for “God and Justice,” and others feel it is for, “Order.” Some may even feel it is for both. This “other conflict” is obscured from sight because most people don’t really comprehend “the order” of society and who or what yields the most authority or power.
Most people think “government” when they think “power or authority,” however there is another “authority on the land” that wields power too. That is the Catholic Church. For those with eyes to see, this has been evidenced in recent realm affairs.
Pope Leo XIV has openly rebuked the war in Iran, the persecution of Christians in the Holy Land, the genocide in Gaza, the assaults against immigrants, and other evils.
Open Warfare
There is another war going on that most people are totally unaware of. It is a war on a battlefield that encompasses every aspect of created reality. This war has been taking place clandestinely in small battles, in little skirmishes, however in times of late it has become overt, “open warfare,” to those of brighter lights. Most people live in a 72 hour…
“Pope Leo has said God ignores the prayers of leaders who wage war and have “hands full of blood”, in an apparent rebuke to the Trump administration. The pontiff made the comments on Sunday as thousands of US troops arrived in the Middle East and days after the US defence secretary, Pete Hegseth, prayed for violence against enemies who deserved “no mercy”.
“During a Palm Sunday mass in St Peter’s Square, the pope said the conflict between Iran, Israel and the US was “atrocious” and that Jesus could not be used to justify war. “This is our God: Jesus, king of peace, who rejects war, whom no one can use to justify war,” he told tens of thousands of worshippers. “He does not listen to the prayers of those who wage war, but rejects them.”
“Quoting a Bible passage, Leo added: “‘Even though you make many prayers, I will not listen: your hands are full of blood.’”
“The Catholic church’s first US pontiff did not name any government or individual, but the unusually pointed remarks followed Hegseth’s prayer for violence on Wednesday and the buildup of US ground forces near Iran. The pope cited a Bible passage in which Jesus upbraided a disciple who used a sword to try to repel soldiers who came to arrest him. Jesus did not arm himself or fight, the pope said. “He revealed the gentle face of God, who always rejects violence. Rather than saving himself, he allowed himself to be nailed to the cross.”
“The plea for peace came as the Pentagon prepared for weeks of ground operations, according to US officials who briefed the Washington Post. The Iranian parliament speaker, Mohammad Bagher Ghalibaf, said his country’s forces were waiting for US troops to “set them on fire”. Leaders on all sides of the conflict have used religion to try to justify their actions. Hegseth’s insertion of his Christian faith into the Pentagon’s actions has drawn particular attention and controversy.”
“Last week at a Christian worship service for military and civilian workers in Washington, Hegseth said: “Let every round find its mark against the enemies of righteousness and our great nation. Give them wisdom in every decision, endurance for the trial ahead, unbreakable unity, and overwhelming violence of action against those who deserve no mercy.”
“The defence secretary is a member of a church affiliated with the Communion of Reformed Evangelical Churches, whose founder self-identifies as a Christian nationalist. The pope has repeatedly called for a ceasefire and a ban on airstrikes in a conflict that has rained destruction on Lebanon, Israel and Gulf states. In his homily on Sunday, the pope lamented that Christians in the region may not be able to celebrate Easter. For Christians, Palm Sunday is the start of a holy week that marks Christ’s arrival in Jerusalem days before his crucifixion and resurrection.”
“On Sunday morning, Israeli police prevented Cardinal Pierbattista Pizzaballa, an archbishop with Catholic jurisdiction across Israel and the Palestinian territories, from entering the Church of the Holy Sepulchre in Jerusalem to conduct mass. The US, France and Italy criticised the decision. The US ambassador Mike Huckabee, a devout evangelical Christian, said the incident was “an unfortunate overreach”. Italy’s prime minister, Giorgia Meloni, said it was “an offence not only to the faithful but to any community that respects religious freedom”, and the French president, Emmanuel Macron, said “the free exercise of worship in Jerusalem must be guaranteed for all religions”.
“The Israeli prime minister, Benjamin Netanyahu, said there had been no “malicious intent” and the cardinal was prevented from accessing the church because of safety concerns. But he later announced that although he understood “this concern”, he had instructed the relevant authorities that Pizzaballa “be granted full and immediate access to the Church of the Holy Sepulchre in Jerusalem”.
https://www.theguardian.com/world/2026/mar/29/pope-rebuke-trump-leaders-with-hands-full-of-blood
All over the realm, those loyal to the Pope are polarizing themselves behind his position. Spain, Italy, France, Switzerland, Austria, and other countries are quietly rotating in an orbit aligned with the Pope. Against this “team” are those aligned with Messianic fanaticism, and by extension the states united and Isn’t-real. This is where the “tug of war” is happening. Nice and quiet, and right in the open.
The conflict had been framed as a religion one by both sides. On one side is the states united, fighting to uphold the “order” that has been in place during the same period evidenced in, “The Files,” and it’s puppet masters in foreign lands. On the other side are the Pope, those aligned with him, those aligned against the states united and those aligned against Isn’t-real. That includes those who sit inactive with “fingers crossed behind their backs.” Slowly the battle simmers, until it reaches it’s boil. That boil is coming up. It is coming up because those fighting for “order” care not for anything else. Most people forget that “Popes” can call for “Jihad” in the same way a Mufti could. Especially when Christian Holy sites are being violated.
“Council of Clermont, an assembly for church reform called by Pope Urban II on November 18, 1095, which became the occasion for initiating the First Crusade. The Council was attended largely by bishops of southern France as well as a few representatives from northern France and elsewhere. As a result of a request by envoys from the Byzantine emperor Alexius I Comnenus to aid the Greeks against the Muslim Turks, Urban II exhorted the French knights at Clermont to rescue the Holy Land from the Turks. Much important ecclesiastical business was transacted, which resulted in a series of canons, among them one that renewed the Peace of God and another that granted a plenary indulgence (the remission of all penance for sin) to those who undertook to aid Christians in the East. Then, in a great outdoor assembly, the pope, a Frenchman, addressed a large crowd, closing his speech with the words “God wills it,” which became a battle cry of the Crusaders.”
The Pope can also “excommunicate.” There are a lot of people involved in the current fiasco in the Middle East that are Catholic. It remains to see what happens with them, but Spain, Italy, Switzerland, Senegal, Austria, South Africa, and France have openly made their choice known.
It gets worse. It has too. There is a script being “played out,” and right now this is only the first “act.” As the realm polarizes towards their respective positions, expect to see and hear much more on this topic. All one has to do is pay attention to the Catholic “players” on the board, and as time passes the true nature of “this theater” will become manifest. War is revenue. War is not fought for “God or Justice.” It is fought for “order.” This conflict, theater or not, will decide “which order” the entire realm moves towards. The “old world order is the new world order.” The only thing that changes is the technology.
See, I have watched closely the conflict in the Middle East. I have watched the Pope’s reactions, the realm reactions, and viewed a plethora of video. It is hard to ascertain the truth of any of it. I mean, while everyone is watching Iran, the country of Lebanon is getting the “Gaza treatment” with over a million people displaced. I see video of cities in isn’t-real, and I see “some damage,” but nothing like Gaza or Lebanon. There are times when live shots don’t even show “smoke on the horizon.” So, it is impossible to ascertain “the truth.” What can be ascertained is that the conflict is being framed as one that pits Good vs. evil. This is being done by those on all sides. This has drawn in the most “over zealous elements” from across the Middle East and Caucasus. Some of these being the most battle hardened “shock troops” from Russia.
This does not include people who will be “joining in” from other lands on both sides, hoping to bolster their team to a win. For anyone “thinking this through” it does not appear to be a victory for anyone being the aggressor in this, unless it is the intention to take casualties, generate funding, and lose. A war of choice is never a wise thing unless it is done in true self defense. Even the President of Iran is joining in. He is trying to communicate his position to the realm and why he believes this all makes not sense. His letter to the American People is here:
In the name of God, the Compassionate, the Merciful
To the people of the United States of America, and to all those who, amid a flood of distortions and manufactured narratives, continue to seek the truth and aspire to a better life:
Iran—by this very name, character, and identity—is one of the oldest continuous civilizations in human history. Despite its historical and geographical advantages at various times, Iran has never, in its modern history, chosen the path of aggression, expansion, colonialism, or domination. Even after enduring occupation, invasion, and sustained pressure from global powers—and despite possessing military superiority over many of its neighbors—Iran has never initiated a war. Yet it has resolutely and bravely repelled those who have attacked it.
The Iranian people harbor no enmity toward other nations, including the people of America, Europe, or neighboring countries. Even in the face of repeated foreign interventions and pressures throughout their proud history, Iranians have consistently drawn a clear distinction between governments and the peoples they govern. This is a deeply rooted principle in Iranian culture and collective consciousness—not a temporary political stance.
For this reason, portraying Iran as a threat is neither consistent with historical reality nor with present-day observable facts. Such a perception is the product of political and economic whims of the powerful— the need to manufacture an enemy in order to justify pressure, maintain military dominance, sustain the arms industry, and control strategic markets. In such an environment, if a threat does not exist, it is invented.
Within this same framework, the United States has concentrated the largest number of its forces, bases, and military capabilities around Iran—a country that, at least since the founding of the United States, has never initiated a war. Recent American aggressions launched from these very bases have demonstrated how threatening such a military presence truly is. Naturally, no country confronted with such conditions would forgo strengthening its defensive capabilities. What Iran has done—and continues to do—is a measured response grounded in legitimate self-defense, and by no means an initiation of war or aggression.
Relations between Iran and the United States were not originally hostile, and early interactions between the Iranian and American people were not marred with hostility or tension. The turning point, however, was the 1953 coup d’état—an illegal American intervention aimed at preventing the nationalization of Iran’s own resources. That coup disrupted Iran’s democratic process, reinstated dictatorship, and sowed deep distrust among Iranians toward U.S. policies. This distrust deepened further with America’s support for the Shah’s regime, its backing of Saddam Hussein during the imposed war of the 1980s, the imposition of the longest and most comprehensive sanctions in modern history, and ultimately, unprovoked military aggression—twice, in the midst of negotiations—against Iran.
Yet all these pressures have failed to weaken Iran. On the contrary, the country has grown stronger in many areas: literacy rates have tripled—from roughly 30% before the Islamic Revolution to over 90% today; higher education has expanded dramatically; significant advances have been achieved in modern technology; healthcare services have improved; and infrastructure has developed at a pace and scale incomparable to the past. These are measurable, observable realities that stand independent of fabricated narratives.
At the same time, the destructive and inhumane impact of sanctions, war, and aggression on the lives of the resilient Iranian people must not be underestimated. The continuation of military aggression and recent bombings profoundly affect people’s lives, attitudes, and perspectives. This reflects a fundamental human truth: when war inflicts irreparable harm on lives, homes, cities, and futures, people will not remain indifferent toward those responsible.
This raises a fundamental question: Exactly which of the American people’s interests are truly being served by this war? Was there any objective threat from Iran to justify such behavior? Does the massacre of innocent children, the destruction of cancer-treatment pharmaceutical facilities, or boasting about bombing a country “back to the stone ages” serve any purpose other than further damaging the United States’ global standing?
Iran pursued negotiations, reached an agreement, and fulfilled all its commitments. The decision to withdraw from that agreement, escalate toward confrontation, and launch two acts of aggression in the midst of negotiations were destructive choices made by the U.S. government—choices that served the delusions of a foreign aggressor.
Attacking Iran’s vital infrastructure—including energy and industrial facilities—directly targets the Iranian people. Beyond constituting a war crime, such actions carry consequences that extend far beyond Iran’s borders. They generate instability, increase human and economic costs, and perpetuate cycles of tension, planting seeds of resentment that will endure for years. This is not a demonstration of strength; it is a sign of strategic bewilderment and an inability to achieve a sustainable solution.
Is it not also the case that America has entered this aggression as a proxy for Israel, influenced and manipulated by that regime? Is it not true that Israel, by manufacturing an Iranian threat, seeks to divert global attention away from its crimes toward the Palestinians? Is it not evident that Israel now aims to fight Iran to the last American soldier and the last American taxpayer dollar—shifting the burden of its delusions onto Iran, the region, and the United States itself in pursuit of illegitimate interests?
Is “America First” truly among the priorities of the U.S. government today?
I invite you to look beyond the machinery of misinformation—an integral part of this aggression—and instead speak with those who have visited Iran. Observe the many accomplished Iranian immigrants—educated in Iran—who now teach and conduct research at the world’s most prestigious universities, or contribute to the most advanced technology firms in the West. Do these realities align with the distortions you are being told about Iran and its people?
Today, the world stands at crossroads. Continuing along the path of confrontation is more costly and futile than ever before. The choice between confrontation and engagement is both real and consequential; its outcome will shape the future for generations to come. Throughout its millennia of proud history, Iran has outlasted many aggressors. All that remains of them are tarnished names in history, while Iran endures—resilient, dignified, and proud.” (finis)
The entire realm it appears is trying to appeal of cooler heads and common sense. However it also appears that the states united and its “greatest ally in the Middle East” are “hell bent” on doubling, or tripling down on what has manifestly been one of the greatest miscalculations and debacles in military history. I really believe that the response from Iran was never considered before an attack on them was initiated. “They are one Wave 90 something and counting.” 90 WAVES. Think about that?”
The Catholic Church wields tremendous power over many realm leaders, nation states, and populations in general. Billions of people reside in lands aligned with Catholic dogma, and traditions. These same people have just witnessed their Holy Palm Sundry shut down by Isn’t-real. They have just witnessed their Church of The Holy Sepulcher shut down to congregants and clergy. They have witnessed their Christian communities in Lebanon and Syria attacked and bombed by Isn’t-real. They saw their Holy sites hit by tank fire. They have also viewed their clergy and fellow parishioners being spit on.
“Even iron wears out,” my people say. So it is only rational to deduce that the Catholic Church is going to level everything it has to “maintain its order.” A old order on this land. Who exactly “facilitated” the transfer of lands in the 1803 Louisiana Purchase Treaty? Who signed off on it, or gave permission for it? The Pope through his subordinate rulers.
“The treaty of San Ildefonso of October 1 1800- Preliminary and Secret Treaty between the French Republic and His Catholic Majesty the King of Spain, Concerning the Aggrandizement of His Royal Highness the Infant Duke of Parma in Italy and the Retrocession of Louisiana.”
“…relative to the rights claimed by the United States in virtue of the Treaty concluded at Madrid the 27 of October 1795, between His Catholic Majesty & the Said United States, & willing to Strengthen the union and friendship which at the time of the Said Convention was happily reestablished between the two nations…”
My people also say, “I brought you into this world, and I will take you out.” This can be applied to the conflict with Catholic power and other “realm actors.” It would be ironic that the same group that “made the states united” would be the same group to help tear it down. It will be torn down if it stays on the current trajectory. It’s the only thing that can happen. I mean, flour, eggs, sugar, oil and milk are the ingredients for making a cake. When mixed together a cake is the only thing that can happen.
Chaos, corruption, confusion, lies, falsehoods, embellishments, insolvency, arrogance, bluster, false bravado, indifference when mixed together makes a catastrophe. It’s the only thing that can happen.
Lord have Mercy