The Deviants of Education

The "Why" of it all. Your tax dollars at work.......................

Ever wonder why the public schools are so obsessed with the sexual indoctrination of children? Ever find yourself disgusted as to why, in spite of opposition from parents, and society at large, the public schools continue to press the deviancy? If so, then I intend to enlighten you. This musing is going to hurt your brain, and if you have one, harden your heart towards public school, along with institutions of “learning” in general. That is what I intend to do. You have to wake up from your public school slumber, it has destroyed this society.

The people of the land cannot defend against what they do not perceive, and perception is key. I tackled this issue in a book in 2019, because I wanted to get to the root of the issue, the motivation, for destroying the innocence of children, and why the devils were so hell bent on doing so. Now I know, with certitude, the evil doers when I see them, their esoteric motivations, and their manifest hoof prints, which are trampling rough shod over ignorant, deceived, naive parents daily, under the guise of “education.”

The Deviants of Education Jean-Baptiste Guillory (2019) All Rights Reserved

Deviant... "a person whose behavior deviates from what is acceptable, especially in sexual behavior."

“This manuscript deals with a topic that is, for many people, a difficult topic to come to grips with. Specifically because anytime there is a conversation about sex, it will likely devolve into some sort of argument revolving around "orientation" or other politically indoctrinated public school mantras. It is hard for the average simple minded person to get past that point. Why? because they can't. Most people have so thoroughly indoctrinated by the public school system and the media platforms, that their own critical thinking is neutered to the point of imbecility, and that's just the way the social engineers want it.

The educational system in America is a hustle, a con, a ruse. It only benefits a small portion of the populace, with the remainder being fodder for whatever type of psychological "manipulation" the controllers desire. Most people have not awoken to the fact that entire society is weaponized against them, and their participation is liken to "braiding the rope to hang themselves." It is discomforting to see adults being victimized, however as adults, they have a choice. With the advent of the internet and availability of smart devices, adults really don't have any excuse for being stupid and sending their children to strangers for knowledge. Again it is a choice. Parents can choose to home school.

Such is not the case with children. Children have a dependency upon adults, and children expect that adults would guide, nurture, and educate them in a manner which is consistent with sensible, rational and moral norms. This "expectation" has become, in the hands of the devils who run the public schools, a weapon that is being utilized to brainwash and indoctrinate the children into deviant, perverse sexual objects, patterned after ancient fraternal rituals.

In the current filthy school model, children as young as 6 are being indoctrinated into the cult of sex worship. This sort of "grooming" is being disguised as education and inclusiveness, however, it makes no difference what title is placed upon it, the result will be the same. The children will become over sexualized, and normalized into sexual deviancy as a matter of course. Thank public school for that.

Now I realize that many people will see this view as extremist or view it as an attack upon the school system. Well, it is not extremist and yes it is an attack upon the attack of children by perverts and sinister adepts. Simple minded people don't understand, are mentally incapable of understanding, that it is no coincidence that there is an upsurge of "sexually orientated" lessons in schools. Simple minded people don't even recognize that there is a problem. Why? Because the same simple minded people as adults were simple minded children indoctrinated by the same system that is raping their children intellectually, and sometimes actually. The same simple minded parents, mentally capitulated by public school indoctrination, don't even realize the extent of the deviancy, and consequently they trust blindly, the care, custody and so called, “education” of their most precious commodity, their children.

Simple minded people don't understand the rituals and foundations of most, if not all of their most cherished institutions and religions. They don't understand that if they don't take an active approach to the education of their children, those same children via school indoctrination will be weaponized against themselves, their parents, societal norms at large, and it will all be rooted in a past of perverse rebellion against true love, affection and the family unit.

The children are being turned in living representations of the many false sexually "orientated" deities and idols of the past; and the gullible parents are part and parcel with it. After all, the "school" says it best.

It is with this in mind that, under duress, this instrument is compiled. In the State of California there is a big push to indoctrinate young children into various forms of deviant sexual behavior, masquerading as education. The strange part of it all is the fact that sexual activity by minors, who are incapable of giving consent, is illegal under the California Code, and nonetheless it is not only promoted, but encouraged.

The social engineers have altered the perceptions of deviancy to suit their own twisted, perverse agenda. Once upon a time, approximately 25 years or so ago, a person who was a homosexual, lesbian or transsexual, could apply for SSI disability, and they would be granted it simply because they were considered mentally ill, a “deviant personality disorder” to be exact. The social engineers decided that should no longer be the case, and a concerted effort was made to change this "mental disorder" into something sane, and acceptable. This could not be accomplished without the express commitment of the public school system and media.

So here we are, children being unwittingly initiated into the mindset of sexual deviancy, and the parents groping like fools, loving every second of it. After all, the school thinks it's best.

In the forthcoming portions of this book, the reader will be treated to an excellent example of the depth of the public school obsession with deviancy. Most people don't even realize that it's not necessarily about the sex act, but rather the perverse "energy" that is created by the participants. Its always about energy. Children are powerhouses of energy, and the dark forces know this. This is why there is such a push for perversion in the child because sexual energy is the strongest, aside from the energy of birth and death.

One clear message from this book should be this, "No matter what costume, dogma, illusion, religious ritual, teaching credential, or custom, it most likely is just a cover to engage in sexual deviancy." It is clear that the priest class, of most societies, have traditionally been allowed to molest, and exploit others simply because the populace was told it was ordained by the Creator. The oldest, and most effective trick ever devised was the sanctioning of mentally ill conduct, mostly sexual and murderous, in the name of some sort of man created false deity. Nothing has changed.

Now the same sort of mentality has been introduced into the school system by the "priest class" of academia. It does not matter what it is called, education, lessons or inclusiveness, it is still the same 'ole soup warmed over, packaged with a fancy updated bow. This book makes clear the utter foolishness that has been historically pushed upon the gullible people, all in the name of some sort of non existent carnal deity, just so the perpetrators could sexually abuse the simple minded.

All of the rituals, chanting, wine, flowers, idols and such are, and were, just stage props, used to capitulate the populace's critical thinking, and thus "open them up" for sexual victimization. The same is now true. What other purpose would it served to "educate" [groom] a 6 year old child in perversity? This indoctrination creates a future generation of young victims, who have learned to accept deviancy as normal. Qui Bono? Who benefits? The sexual predators that trawl the public schools, that's who. Google the term "Teacher Arrested" and prepare yourself for a menagerie of sexual exploitation of innocent children in schools by the same people who are pushing the deviancy agenda. They are literally grooming the children as future prospects right in everyone's face, and the parent except it.

Only a fool would believe, for one second, that the people pushing the agenda are not involved in such behavior. As this book makes clear, this behavior is practiced by most, if not all, of the controlling groups from clergy, academics, fraternities, all and sundry.

What can be done? A lot. First of all people can educate themselves in the real mechanics of society. Society is nothing like the public school has indoctrinated the populace into believing, in fact the schools just veil society in mystery. Secondly, a parent can start to resist "mentally" the energy associated with the aforementioned deviancy. Once the mind is engaged in the vehement opposition to such foolishness, based upon education, then the seeds of relief can flourish. As long as a person "agrees" with someone else's agenda for their children, then there is no hope. It is the strangers at school (teachers) who are running roughshod over the values and morals of decent parents. It is the stranger at school whom you will find in your Google search of "Teacher Arrested." A stranger cannot raise your child. A stranger cannot be trusted with your child, as their values are different.

Third and lastly, I would be remiss if I did not offer a solution, at least for the parents in California.

California Education Code, Section 51938:

(a) A parent or guardian of a pupil has the right to excuse their child from all or part of comprehensive sexual health education, HIV prevention education, and assessments related to that education through a passive consent (“opt-out”) process. A school district shall not require active parental consent (“opt-in”) for comprehensive sexual health education and HIV prevention education.

(b) At the beginning of each school year, or, for a pupil who enrolls in a school after the beginning of the school year, at the time of that pupil’s enrollment, each school district shall notify the parent or guardian of each pupil about instruction in comprehensive sexual health education and HIV prevention education and research on pupil health behaviors and risks planned for the coming year. The notice shall do all of the following:

(1) Advise the parent or guardian that written and audiovisual educational materials used in comprehensive sexual health education and HIV prevention education are available for inspection.

(2)Advise the parent or guardian whether the comprehensive sexual health education or HIV prevention education will be taught by school district personnel or by outside consultants. A school district may provide comprehensive sexual health education or HIV prevention education, to be taught by outside consultants, and may hold an assembly to deliver comprehensive sexual health education or HIV prevention education by guest speakers, but if it elects to provide comprehensive sexual health education or HIV prevention education in either of these manners, the notice shall include the date of the instruction, the name of the organization or affiliation of each guest speaker, and information stating the right of the parent or guardian to request a copy of this section, Section 51933, and Section 51934. If arrangements for this instruction are made after the beginning of the school year, notice shall be made by mail or another commonly used method of notification, no fewer than 14 days before the instruction is delivered.

(3) Include information explaining the parent’s or guardian’s right to request a copy of this chapter.

(4) Advise the parent or guardian that the parent or guardian has the right to excuse their child from comprehensive sexual health education and HIV prevention education and that in order to excuse their child they must state their request in writing to the school district.

(c) Notwithstanding Section 51513, anonymous, voluntary, and confidential research and evaluation tools to measure pupils’ health behaviors and risks, including tests, questionnaires, and surveys containing age-appropriate questions about the pupil’s attitudes concerning or practices relating to sex, may be administered to any pupil in grades 7 to 12, inclusive. A parent or guardian has the right to excuse their child from the test, questionnaire, or survey through a passive consent (“opt-out”) process. A school district shall not require active parental consent (“opt-in”) for these tests, questionnaires, or surveys in grades 7 to 12, inclusive. Parents or guardians shall be notified in writing that this test, questionnaire, or survey is to be administered, given the opportunity to review the test, questionnaire, or survey if they wish, notified of their right to excuse their child from the test, questionnaire, or survey, and informed that in order to excuse their child they must state their request in writing to the school district.

(d) The use of outside consultants or guest speakers as described in paragraph (2) of subdivision (b) is within the discretion of the school district.

(Amended by Stats. 2015, Ch. 398, Sec. 14. (AB 329) Effective January 1, 2016.)

California Education Code Section, 51939:

(a) A pupil may not attend any class in comprehensive sexual health education or HIV prevention education, or participate in any anonymous, voluntary, and confidential test, questionnaire, or survey on pupil health behaviors and risks, if the school has received a written request from the pupil’s parent or guardian excusing the pupil from participation.

(b) A pupil may not be subject to disciplinary action, academic penalty, or other sanction if the pupil’s parent or guardian declines to permit the pupil to receive comprehensive sexual health education or HIV prevention education or to participate in anonymous, voluntary, and confidential tests, questionnaires, or surveys on pupil health behaviors and risks.

(c)While comprehensive sexual health education, HIV prevention education, or anonymous, voluntary, and confidential test, questionnaire, or survey on pupil health behaviors and risks is being administered, an alternative educational activity shall be made available to pupils whose parents or guardians have requested that they not receive the instruction or participate in the test, questionnaire, or survey.

(Amended by Stats. 2015, Ch. 398, Sec. 14. (AB 329) Effective January 1, 2016.)

California Education Code, Section 51950:

(a) A school district may provide abuse, including sexual abuse, and human trafficking prevention education.

(b) For purposes of this section, “abuse, including sexual abuse, and human trafficking prevention education” means instruction on the prevalence and nature of abuse, including sexual abuse, and human trafficking, strategies to reduce risk, techniques to set healthy boundaries, and how to safely seek assistance.

(c) A parent or guardian of a pupil shall have the right to excuse his or her child from all or part of abuse, including sexual abuse, and human trafficking prevention education, and assessments related to that education, consistent with Section 51938.

(d) The department may make available on the department’s Internet Web site information about the education described in this section, resources on abuse, including sexual abuse, and human trafficking prevention for professional learning purposes, and relevant materials for parents, guardians, and other caretakers of pupils.

(e) A school district is encouraged to collaborate with its county’s child welfare probation, mental health, public health, and sheriff’s departments, juvenile court, and office of education on intervention programs for pupils and other minors.

(f) As part of satisfying the requirements of Section 51934 that education be provided by instructors trained in the appropriate courses, as defined in Section 51931, continuation training shall be available and conducted periodically to enable school district personnel to learn about new developments in the under- standing of abuse, including sexual abuse, and human trafficking, and to receive instruction on current prevention efforts and methods. A school district is encouraged to include training on early identification of abuse, including sexual abuse, and human trafficking of pupils and other minors.

(Amended by Stats. 2017, Ch. 558, Sec. 4. (AB 1227) Effective January 1, 2018.)

It is mandatory that parents notify their child's school IN WRITING, that they object to the aforementioned indoctrination. It is probably prudent for the parent to mail this written objection to the actual school and the district headquarters, certified mail, return receipt requested and follow up with a email to the school principal.

It is also mandatory that the parents of a child so situated also request from the school principle a written instrument detailing exactly what steps will be taken to ensure that the needs of the parents and child are addressed. A detail plan for the removal of the child from such indoctrination specifically outlined is best. A verbal promise from the school is insufficent. These people cannot be trusted.

A parent may also NOTICE, via certified mail, the school, that failure to comply with the parental dictates is actionable, will result in a claim for damages or other civil ramifications, including, but not limited , to the removal of the child from the school, an insurance claim with the district insurer, and a performance bond from school district, with the parents as beneficiary, being required for re-attendance of said student at the school in question.

Please note, when it comes to a child, there is no room for error. The school system has proven, over generations, especially in the minority neighborhoods, to be a detriment to the growth of the community and a vehement enemy. Do not make oral agreements with them. All contacts and dictates regarding any child should be in writing, and foundated upon notice of civil redress for violating parental rights. The school districts are not to be trusted otherwise.

In order to comprehend the obsession with sexualizing children, one must comprehend the religious ritual foundations of such. Again, its just a new twist on old evil. Read, digest, contemplate, and seek redress if similarly situated.

PREFACE.

"This work has for its object a general presentation of sex worship, or phallicism (the worship of the generative powers of nature), for the purpose of demonstrating that the various religious faiths of the world have had a common origin, and are founded upon a natural, material basis— the adoration of life in its phenomena of creation and reproduction.”

“A thorough and exhaustive treatment of the subject is, of course, beyond the scope of the present work, which is limited solely to an exposition of the principal and more salient features of phallicism, in its direct and obvious relation to theology and to the religious beliefs and symbols of the present day. No attempt has, therefore, been made to treat any of the particular or more complex phases of the subject, nor to discuss its social and physiological aspects, which, although of great value and interest, could not appropriately be treated within the limits of this volume.”

“The work here presented embodies a large amount of original research, as well as the investigations of leading authorities on the subject, all of whose works have been carefully studied. The author has avoided making any foot-note references to these authorities, for not only do such notes fail to serve any practical purpose— except to satisfy the critical reader that the writer has not drawn upon his own imagination,—but in the present instance the data at the command of the author have been gathered from such a variety of sources, and the evidence presented by them is so largely cumulative, while at the same time they are so closely interwoven with the facts derived from the author’s individual investigations and discoveries, that it would be a difficult matter to classify his statements in accordance with their primary source.”

“It has, therefore, been deemed sufficient to append hereto a list of the principal books on phallicism consulted by the author in the preparation of this work. While this list does not pretend to be a complete bibliography, it probably represents the most important English works on phallic worship, and will, it is hoped, be of service to such students as may desire to investigate the subject more fully.

All of these books, however, are exceedingly rare and difficult to obtain, for up to this time the study of sex worship has been confined to a small class of scholars and investigators, who have been careful to withhold from the public the comparatively few works on the subject; so that the general student has had little or no opportunity for acquainting himself with the revelations of this important branch of knowledge. It is hoped, therefore, that the present work may prove of interest to the thoughtful and intelligent public, for whom it is designed, and that it will be received and appreciated in the spirit that its importance and significance deserve.”

“No subject is of greater importance and significance in the evolution of the human race than that of sex worship—the adoration of the generative organs as symbols of the creative powers of nature. It is indelibly impressed upon our beliefs, our language and our institutions. It constitutes the basis of theology, and underlies the mythologies of all nations. It is the source of our present religious symbols and church architecture, and is the origin of many of our most familiar and sacred celebrations. In a word, it is the foundation of religious faith and worship.”

“Sex worship, or phallicism, was not confined to any one race nor to any particular age in the history of the world. It was the form of worship common to all the early nations of the globe ; a worship universally inspired by the manifestations of nature in her great mystery of life and procreation. While the highest development of phallicism was reached by the ancient Egyptians, Assyrians, Hindoos, Greeks, and Romans, proof of the existence of this form of religion is to be found in every part of the earth inhabited by man. Persia, India, Ceylon, China, Japan, Burmah, Java, Arabia, Syria, Asia Minor, Egypt, Ethiopia, Europe and the British Isles, together with Mexico, Central America, Peru and various other portions of the western hemisphere—all yield abundant evidence in support of the universality of phallic worship as a primitive form of religion, and of the common origin of theological creeds.”

“It must not, however, be supposed that sex worship was peculiar alone to the past ages. It is common among primitive peoples in all parts of the world to-day ; and in India, where this form of religion has existed uninterruptedly for thousands of years, there are at the present time upwards of one hundred million true phallic worshipers. Among the Zufii and other North American tribes phallicism enters largely into their religious ceremonies, while the natives of many of the Pacific islands and various parts of Africa are most ardent devotees in the worship of the procreative functions, and practice their religion in the realistic and unequivocal manner of primeval naturalness.”

“While there are doubtless many who may be inclined to question the relationship between the religious rites and symbols of the present day, and those employed in the past ages of phallic worship, the fact nevertheless remains—and is appreciated by all students of ethnology,— that religious institutions as they exist today are but the outgrowth or modification of others that preceded them, or are simply a continuation of ancient forms adapted to new meanings or purposes. This is true of all features of sociological life, and is a necessary incident of the progress of society and of the evolution of the human mind.”

“In the study of language, for example, we find innumerable instances in which the primary meaning of a word or a name has been completely altered. In the course of time the original significance has lost its force, and the word has become adapted to a new meaning, having no resemblance whatsoever to that which it had at first; as in the case of our word idiot (to cite one example out of a thousand), which, in the original Greek, was a term used to distinguish a private citizen from one who held office, and had no reference to his mental qualities.”

“In the same manner many of our social customs have come down to us through the centuries, and are retained either as a matter of habit, or because they fit some present condition, though their original purpose has long been forgotten or has become obsolete. This is illustrated in our custom of shaking hands as a mode of greeting; a practice that had its beginning in the days when every man stood ready to slay his fellow-creatures, and when good will and friendship could best be shown by a man’s giving to another his right hand, thereby indicating his peaceable intentions through his inability to draw his sword ; and to this day we continue to give the right hand, to the exclusion of the left, although the sense and reason for it no longer exist.”

“So, also, do our present marriage customs afford a striking example of the relationship existing between primitive and modern institutions, and of the influence and persistence of the primary features of the social organism through all the ages of its growth and development. Probably there are few who stop to seek the primary reason for many of our marriage customs—why it is that the woman receives presents prior to the wedding ; why the man invariably goes to the house of the bride, and the bride never to the house of the groom, to be married ; why the bridegroom is attended by a “ best man,” why he has a ring placed upon the finger of the bride, and why he hurries away with her on a wedding journey.”

“These and many other incidents of marriage are so familiar to us, and have become so much a matter of course, that we do not realize that in these customs we are but repeating in conventional form the acts of our primitive and savage forefathers, in those early days of human society when a man was obliged either to capture his wife and run away with her (an undertaking ofttimes requiring the assistance of a trusted friend), or to purchase her with gifts contributed by

himself and his family ; for a wife was a mere chattel, to be fought for or purchased ; and, when finally possessed, the token of her subjugation was a ring (the badge of servitude), which was placed upon one of her fingers.”

“To those who have given any attention to the growth and derivation of human institutions these illustrative facts will at once be appreciated, and their citation may, perhaps, be considered an unnecessary digression. Yet they will undoubtedly tend to more readily convince the general reader that many features peculiar to human society may very easily have a past significance entirely at variance with that which they have to-day; so that it should not prove surprising to find that what is true of our language and our social customs, is equally true of our theology and church symbolism ; that many of our religious customs and emblems have come down to us from a remote past, and have simply been adapted to meanings and purposes in accordance with our present ideas and social conditions.”

“In viewing the forms and ceremonials connected with the nature worship of early civilization it should be constantly borne in mind that, however extravagant or absurd they may appear to us, they served in their time a definite and reasonable purpose—that nothing comes into existence except as the result of an efficient cause. It must be remembered that among the early races of mankind language was largely symbolical ; that primitive man was obliged to resort to suggestive natural objects—and their more or less conventional symbolization—for the conveyance of his ideas ; and hence the sun, the moon, the stars, the day and the night, the trees, the flowers, the animals—in short, all phenomena and forms of life were called into requisition to supply his need for some means of expressing his thoughts and emotions. Consequently, many objects and functions were given meanings which we to-day fail to appreciate, because of our dependence upon a fixed and formal language, and our consequent failure to see in these objects and functions anything beyond their direct and intrinsic significance.”

“Nor must we fall into the error of regarding the rites and symbols of phallicism in the light of modern prejudice. While on their surface they may appear incompatible with our present ideas of propriety, it should not be forgotten that morality and religion are purely relative terms, and that what is highly improper at one time may be both proper and religious at another. It is scarcely necessary to remind any one, however superficial may be his knowledge of history, that man’s conceptions of right and wrong have been constantly changing; that the standard of morality and religion has been different in each age ; that the virtue of yesterday is the sin of to-day, and that what one race has regarded with reverence another has spurned with condemnation.”

“Each age, and each nation in the history of the world has had its individual ideals of morality ; and each race and each community to-day has its independent conceptions of virtue and goodness ; and while each set of people is convinced of the correctness of its own standard of ethics, no two of these standards agree in all particulars. On the contrary, many of them are in direct opposition to one another. It is only proper, therefore, in studying the customs and beliefs of any particular age or of a particular race, that we should acquaint ourselves with the surrounding and influencing conditions ; with the social and mental status of the race or community, and view its people from the standpoint of their own time and their own life conditions and environment, without any reference to what may be the prevailing notions or beliefs as the result of entirely different conditions.”

“In a primitive state of society man expresses himself with equal freedom and unreserved on all natural and physiological phenomena within his observation. Experience has not yet suggested to him any necessity for concealing certain bodily functions, or for regarding certain of his appetites as essentially different from any of his other natural desires. This is a matter of common knowledge and observation, and is abundantly attested by the records and the history of mankind ; the evidence contained in the Old Testament being alone sufficient to convince any one of this feature of primordial social conditions. Not only do we find the writers of sacred history freely and unaffectedly referring to many things that in this day are considered indecent and unholy, or at least unfit for general discussion, but the Lord himself is recorded as speaking on these topics with a frequency and in a manner to leave no doubt that nothing in their nature or suggestiveness rendered them in those early days unworthy of even divine mention.”

“This characteristic of the Scriptural writings is familiar to all readers of the Bible, and would prove of even greater significance and force were it not for the fact that many Hebrew words and expressions have been altered in their translation from the original, where they appear in a boldness and directness of meaning quite incompatible with latter-day notions of refinement, and which cannot fail to satisfy the most skeptical, that matters pertaining to the generative functions and to the sexes were formerly discussed with perfect familiarity and plainness, with no thought of impropriety or immodesty. But aside from all ethical considerations, it is only necessary to remember that religion, in whatever form it may be manifested, always represents man’s highest and purest thought, and that no one would deliberately introduce into his religious worship anything that to his mind was impure or unholy.”

“If phallic worship sometimes degenerated into licentiousness and other inconsistent practices, it is no more reasonable on this account to question its inherent righteousness and purity, than to deride Christianity because of the many sins that have been committed in its name by those who have prostituted religion to selfish and unholy purposes. Therefore, however absurd or unreasonable sex worship may appear to us at this day, let us not forget that it was man’s religion at the dawn of civilization; that it represents a stage in the development of the human mind, and that the grandest theologies of to-day are the outcome of this primitive mode of worship ; that it constitutes the basis of all that is sacred, holy and beautiful.”

CHAPTER I.

THE BASIS OF RELIGION.

“The animating impulse of all organic life is the sexual instinct. It is that which underlies the struggle for existence in the animal world, and is the source of all human endeavor and emotion. That affinity which draws the two sexes together for the purpose of uniting in the production of a new being—that overmastering, universal impulse—is the most powerful factor in all that pertains to the human race, and has ever been the cause and the subject of man’s most exalted thought.”

“In this day and age, when matters pertaining to the sexes are generally avoided, and we are taught that the sexual appetite is an animal craving, that should be subdued and concealed as unworthy of man’s superior nature, it is not surprising that the great majority of persons are blind to the vast importance and significance of the sexual nature in its relation to the affairs of the world, and that they fail to realize that not only is it the cause of our individual existence, but that it is the foundation of society and the well-spring of human life and happiness.”

“It is not our purpose here to enter upon a discussion of the physiological features of the subject, showing the intimate and unavoidable relationship existing between the mind and the sexual instinct ; but suffice it to say, that were man deprived of this instinct it would not only result in the extermination of the race (for procreation would be impossible in the absence of this animating desire), but all ambition, endeavor and affection, all poetry, art and religion—in short, all the emotions and achievements inspired by what we term love would cease, and the world would become cold and passionless ; destitute of sentiment or aspiration, devoid of any incentive to progress or energy; while the intricate and reciprocal machinery of human society, robbed of its motive force, would come to a stop and crumble away in hopeless disorganization.”

“It is universally admitted that love is the animating spirit of the world ; and what is love but a manifestation of the sexual instinct ? The civilized man, who woos the object of his affection through the medium of inspired poetry and other sentimental graces, who reveals the longings of his heart in language and conduct at once pure, refined and tender, and who instinctively shrinks from the suggestion of any sensuality in his feelings, is nevertheless actuated by precisely the same motive as that which governs the savage in his brutal and uncouth demonstration of desire toward one of the opposite sex. Each is but giving expression, in accordance with his individual nature and social conditions, to the same feeling, the same impulse. In the one case we recognize it as love ; in the other, as sensuality ; yet both spring from the same source ; both are animated by the same instinct.”

“Whatever reluctance there may be in admitting this physical truth, is due to the unfortunate fact that we have been taught to regard the generative nature as confined wholly within the narrow limits of its purely sensual manifestations, as exhibited in lust and mere animal gratification ; and, consequently, we fail to recognize it in its higher, nobler and all-pervading form of love. But viewing it in its broad and true aspect, untrammeled by arbitrary definitions, we are forced to admit its vital importance as the supreme factor in the life and welfare of the human race.”

“Love, as an abstract power, is ever glorified and idealized, because we see in it the source, the inspiration, of all beauty, morality and sublimity ; the incentive to deeds of the highest and noblest character ; the elevating and controlling spirit of man’s life. Every poet, every artist, every composer—all who are gifted with power of most truly expressing the loftiest emotions and feelings of mankind have found their inspiration in the inexhaustible theme of love ; and no language, no expression, has ever been deemed too exalted, too far-reaching, for the portrayal of this universal and omnipotent passion.”

“In our idealization of love it soars beyond the bounds of earthly limitations, and we hesitate not to ascribe to it a divine character, and to embrace it in the highest and most sacred sphere of man’s intellectual domain—religion. Nay, do we not raise it to the loftiest point capable of attainment by the human mind, when we reverently exclaim, “ God is love " —when we bow down and worship it as the divine essence, the supreme power?”

“It is not within the province of this work to attempt a complete analysis of love, or sexuality, in its complex relation to these higher and more subtle phases of human thought and conduct ; but enough has been said to indicate that the animating spirit of the human mind—the underlying principle of its lofty and holy emotions, is the spiritualizing power of the sexual instinct; that this impulse lies at the foundation of all thought and action, and finds its grandest and most exalted expression in religion.”

“Love is both the foundation and the pinnacle of religion ; the beginning and the end of human thought and aspiration. Religious emotion springs from the animating power of the sexual nature, and through the emotion thus aroused we deify and worship the inspirational source of our spiritual longings. In every sense, both physical and spiritual, both material and ideal, love is the animating, creative force of the world ; the divine immanence of the universe; the actuating source of life, and the indwelling spirit of the soul; the beginning and end of all that is. It is not intended, however, that the proof of the basis of religious worship shall alone rest upon a physiological analysis, however complete or demonstrative, but that the records of human history shall bear witness to the fact, that theology has sprung from the animating impulse of life, and that it has for its primary and universal object the worship of its inspiring cause ; the worship of the mystery of life, of creation and reproduction; the worship of the omnipotent creative power.”

“Of all the phenomena of nature there is none that has always so strongly excited the wonder and reverence of mankind as that of procreation—the transmission of life from one generation to another. At all times and on all hands we behold nature engaged in her ceaseless work of reproduction ; and yet the mystery of that wondrous creative power, which causes the plant to spring from the tiny seed, and brings the child—a new being— into the world, is to-day as deep and inspiring as it was to the mind of man in the early dawn of the world’s history.”

“One of the first problems of human thought is that regarding creation. Where do we come from ? How is life produced? Who brings the new beings into the world? These are the natural and innocent questions that perplex the mind of every child; questions that from time immemorial have been asked by mankind, and have inspired a responsive belief in the existence of an eternal and almighty creative power; a belief that is common to all people of the world, and which constitutes the central and basic truth of all religious faiths.”

“It is apparent to every one who has had an opportunity of studying the subject, that all religions have had a common origin, and that however much they may differ in their teachings and their institutions, they but represent different methods of worshiping one and the same object. Allah, Jehovah, God, and are simply different names for the same deity, as viewed from different standpoints ; and this deity, this universal object of adoration, is the supreme creative power.”

“When the ambassador from the French court presented to the Buddhist king of Siam the request of Louis XIV that he would embrace Christianity, he replied : “ It is strange that the king of France should interest himself so much in a matter which concerns only God, whilst He whom it does concern seems to have left it wholly to our discretion. Had it been agreeable to the Creator that all nations should have the same form of worship, would it not have been as easy for him in his omnipotence to have created all men with the same sentiments and dispositions, and to have inspired them with the same notions of the True Religion, as to endow them with such different tempers and inclinations? Ought we not rather to believe that the true God has as much pleasure in being honored by a variety of forms and ceremonies, as in being praised and glorified by a number of different creatures?”

“Even they who worship other gods,” says Krishna, the incarnate deity, in an ancient Hindu poem, “ worship me although they know it not.”

“These expressions, embody the teachings of the higher philosophy of the Buddhist and Hindu religions, which recognize the true source and motive of all religious faiths. According to them there is but one religion ; one supreme, everlasting truth ; and the so-called different religions of the world are but different modes of manifesting and expressing this eternal truth.”

“No two individuals, however closely related by birth and circumstances, ever view the same object in exactly the same light. Much less, therefore, can we expect widely separated nations, living under entirely different conditions, to resemble one another in their views and customs and to construct similar systems of morality and church government. Each builds its social and theological structure in accordance with its ideas and needs ; each constructs a form of religion suitable to its conditions, mental and physical. Every being, every race, every age, has a form of religion in conformity with its individual status and necessities. The savage no more comprehends our abstract, impersonal conception of the Almighty, than can we understand his reverence for a supreme god in the form of a wooden idol; yet both the savage and ourselves are worshiping identically the same object, and are actuated by the same motive.”

“These facts become all the more apparent when we note how great is the diversity of thought and conduct among people of the same community and of the same religious faith. Do we not see Christianity broken up into a multitude of sects and denominations, each observing the same religion in a different manner? And do we not realize that the idea of God is subject to a multitude of interpretations?”

“In short, we find that the fundamental religious beliefs of the world have remained unchanged from time immemorial, however diversified and contradictory have been their super-incumbent theologies, and that beneath the outward and ceremonial differences of the various faiths of mankind, throughout all the world and throughout all the ages of human history, there are to be found the same legends and the same beliefs ; all pointing to a common origin, to a universal foundation —the worship of nature in its great mystery of life ; the worship of the supreme creative power.”

“The universal employment of the cross in all ages, as a symbol of life and immortality, demonstrates most conclusively the innate and overmastering reverence of mankind for the divine act of generation,— the union of the sexes;—not only because of the ecstatic exaltation that it inspired (which, in many of the ancient religious and philosophical writings, is regarded as a momentary union with God, an absorption into the Divine Soul), but because of its wonderful and sublime result. It was the acme of human bliss, a glimpse of the Divine Nature, the immortalizing act of God. It was this which first awoke in man a realization of the soul, a belief in the immortality of life.”

“To the philosophers of antiquity man and woman in their individualities were incomplete creatures ; they were but component parts of one being. They had in them the potentiality of reproduction and immortality, but in themselves they were barren and impotent. It was only in their union, in their reciprocal and co-operative activity, that they became one,—a perfect soul. Only then were they capable of fulfilling the divine will for which they were mutually created.”

“It is by no means surprising, therefore, that this wondrous and omnipotent act should have been made the object of divine worship ; and to this day the union of the sexes is solemnized with religious ceremonies, in continued recognition of its holiness. According to law, marriage is simply a civil contract, a mere agreement to live together, and may be executed before any duly qualified officer of the law ; but the vast majority of us prefer that this contract shall be made the occasion of a religious celebration. In fact, many believe that marriage is not valid unless performed by a representative of the Lord, and attended with blessings and ceremonial rites. The nuptial tie is held to be a divine bond,—“ Those whom God hath joined together let no man put asunder.” And, after all, what is the object of a marriage ceremony but a sanctification of the sexual union ? Reverence for the sacredness of this union is still inherent in mankind, and, because of its holiness, cannot be consummated until properly sanctioned and hallowed by these religious ceremonies. To engage in the act of generation in the absence of such consecratory rites, is regarded as a wrong or a crime, even as it was four and five thousand years ago.”

“In all ancient religions this reverent regard for the divine act of creation led to the adoption of various rites and practices for the sanctification of sexual unions, not only in the form of marriage, but of prostitution, which, under certain circumstances, was considered both proper and holy. Every ancient temple had connected with it a number of consecrated women, whose office it was to submit themselves to the embraces of any man who might come in unto them, upon the payment of a specified sum ; the money thus received being used for religious purposes.”

“To the minds of the ancients no more appropriate nor holy means could be devised for raising money for the maintenance of the temple than a sanctified indulgence in the Divine Act. It was the most sublime and sacred of all human functions—the consummation of God’s will,—and, consequently, God’s temple was the most fitting place for its performance.”

“One of the earliest allusions to these consecrated temple-women is found in the book of Genesis 38, where we are told that Tamar deceived her father -in-law, Judah, by veiling herself after the manner of the women of the temple, and sitting before the door of Enajim, where Judah beheld her and went in unto her. The women of this class wore a special attire, the principal feature of which was a long veil, and conducted themselves quietly, not seeking customers, but waiting for them to make the first approach. In this guise Tamar succeeded in enticing Judah, who thought she was a temple attendant and, consequently, one with whom he was permitted to associate. The ordinary harlot of the Hebrews was an outcast, and was conspicuous by her immodest attire and bold conduct, it being not unusual for women of this character to rush up to men and kiss them in public.”

“Consecrated prostitution was common among all the early nations of the world, and was everywhere regarded in the most sacred light. Some of the ancient places of worship were devoted entirely to this holy purpose, as appears from the fact that the chief temple of Babylon was called Bit-Shaggathu, which means, literally, the Temple for Copulation.”

“The number of women attached to some of these places was very large ; the temple Yemis at Corinth, having no less than a thousand sacred prostitutes connected with it, while a similar number belonged to the temple of the same goddess at Eryx. In later times, among the Greeks and Romans, this practice lost much of its religious aspect, degenerating into sheer licentiousness, and Juvenal tells us that every temple in Rome was practically a licensed brothel.”

“This practice, in its religious purity, is still in vogue in many parts of India, where every important temple belonging to the worshipers of what is known as the Sacteyan faith, has attached to it a troop of nautch girls, or “ women of the idol,” who are considered as holy devotees of the faith. These girls are chosen by the priests, when quite young, on account of their beauty, health and activity, and it is regarded as a rare honor by parents to have a daughter selected for this holy profession; even high officials and dignitaries looking upon it as a proud distinction.”

“Among some of the Hindoo sects these consecrated girls are considered particularly sacred, as personifications of the goddess Bhagavatee, and are the objects of devout adoration. Many persons perform the worship of these girls daily. This is done by placing the girl, generally in a nude condition, upon a seat with flowers, paints, scented water and fruits, and addressing to her prayers and expressions of adoration. She is then presented with costly offerings of cloth, ornaments and wines, and at the conclusion of the ceremony, which is a lengthy and elaborate one, the worshiper offers incense, and prostrates himself before the living idol.”

“After reaching sexual maturity these girls are initiated into the mysteries and duties of their profession, by the consummation of their marriage to the god. Their great natural beauty is heightened by all the enticements of drapery, jewels, seductive arts and general feminine witchery. Of all their arts dancing is the most highly cultivated ; not, however, the mode of dancing to which we are accustomed, but consisting of a pantomime made up of the most graceful and alluring dramatic action, gestures, twistings and marvelous undulatory and expressive motions of the arms and legs and the whole body; a performance which is at once poetical, sensual and skillful, and constitutes the chief ostensible employment of these nautch girls.”

“Their true office, however, is to secure revenue for the sustenance and enrichment of the temple, by giving themselves to all who desire and are willing to pay for their possession. As they are beautiful, and accomplished in all seductive and passion-alluring arts, and are safe companions, by reason of their perfect state of health, and as it is considered both honorable and holy on their part, as well as on the part of their patrons, thus to swell the treasury of the temple, it need not be wondered that they are much sought after and well paid for this part of their services.”

“These consecrated women are treated with the greatest reverence and respect; while a Hindoo woman who prostitutes herself for private gain, is an outcast and bears a disgraceful name ; a further illustration of the sanctity attached to the Divine Act, and of the pollution and profanation resulting from its performance in the absence of religious auspices.”

“Among many of the ancients it was taught that sexual indulgence was the true and only aim in life, and that it was a religious duty every man and woman owed to God, the Creator. This doctrine was not infrequently carried to its extreme; nor was it peculiar alone to the people of antiquity, for we find that in the Middle Ages certain sects of Christians held that true blessedness on earth consisted in the full and unstinted enjoyment of venereal pleasures, which were ordained by the Lord as the divine means of fulfilling his glorious purpose, and of bringing mankind more closely into communion with himself and with the eternal blessedness that awaited them hereafter. This idea was in some instances carried to such an extent, that not only were gross sensuality and crime permitted, but were actually recommended, if necessary for the attainment of the desired end.”

“According to one of these sects, known as the Gnostics, the greatest of all sins (in fact, the only sin) consisted in opposing the appetites and passions. These were gifts of God ; they were given to man for a divine purpose, and every inclination inspired by them must be fulfilled as a religious duty ; a tenet which found many earnest followers, whose practices were fully in keeping with their beliefs. A custom adopted by them and religiously carried out, was that which required the host to offer his wife to any stranger or friend who was entertained at the house. To them genuine hospitality consisted in placing at the disposal of the visitor all that the host possessed, at the same time affording the guest an opportunity of indulging in the rite prescribed by the sect.”

“The custom in this case was noteworthy, because of its adoption and practice by civilized men; but it has always been a common feature of primitive social conditions, and at the present day is to be found among many of the uncivilized people of the world. Among the coast tribes of British Columbia the present of a wife is one of the greatest honors that can be shown to a guest. The savage offers a visitor his wife as we offer him a seat at the table. It is not always the wife, however, that is offered ; it is sometimes a daughter, a sister, or a servant. Thus, the people of Madagascar warn strangers to behave with decency to their wives, while they readily and willingly offer their daughters. A Tungas will give his daughter for a time to any friend or traveler to whom he takes a fancy ; and if he has no daughter, he will give a servant, but not his wife ; while in other tribes wives are commonly given up and exchanged in token of friendship,—customs which will no doubt remind the reader of the practice in ancient Sparta of borrowing and loaning wives.”

“The worship of the act of generation was common to all nations of the world, and formed an important feature of many of their religious celebrations in honor of the procreative deities. ‘'Homage to the Creator consisted not only in offerings and songs of praise, but in the ceremonial exercise of the sacred function of generation itself; for, according to the teachings of all religions, no act can be more holy than that done in imitation of the Deity. To be as God, to do as he has done, to follow in his footsteps, are the golden and fundamental precepts of every religious faith. It was but natural, therefore, that the divine act of creation should have been devoutly performed as a religious rite, in the pious endeavor to thus imitate the Almighty in his glorious work of creation and reproduction, and that it should have been made the object of special worship.”

“A typical example of the manner in which this ancient rite was frequently performed, is to be found at this day among the Kauchiluas of India. Social restraints are wholly obliterated for the time being, in honor of the Creator and his divine functions. The women—maids and matrons—deposit their bodices in a box, each garment and each woman being numbered by a priest. At the close of the ritual of song and prayer, each male worshiper takes a bodice from the box, and the woman who has the number corresponding to that on the garment, even though it be the sister or daughter of the man who draws it, becomes his partner for the fulfillment of that which has been the subject of their worship and praise during the preceding ceremonies.”

“This rite and the wild excesses that are sometimes incidental to it, are engaged in by the most devout and pure-minded men and women; the majority of whom, outside of this ceremony (which they consider a sacred and solemn observance of their faith), are as modest and as chaste as any of their more enlightened fellow-beings of the western world.”

“Indiscriminate intercourse of this kind was practiced in the temples, as a customary feature of the vernal festivals of the Greeks and Romans, held in honor of the procreative deities, and was condoned and recommended as a proper and appropriate means of glorifying the gods ; while St. Augustine leads us to infer that the celebration of the Eucharist among the early Christians was not infrequently concluded in a like manner.”

“Festivals of a similar kind were celebrated throughout Egypt, in honor of Isis and Osiris, the deities of procreation. The celebration at Mendes was particularly noteworthy, for it was there that the sacred goat was employed in the ceremonies. These were of an intensely religious character, inducing a high state of excitement and enthusiasm, at the climax of which many of the women offered themselves to the goat, as the divine representative of the Deity.”

“We are told by Herodotus that the goat accepted this unnatural copulation, and that the union took place publicly in the assembly, being regarded by all as a most holy and sacred performance ; and the women who thus gave their persons were held in particular reverence thereafter as the recipients of divine favor. This particular feature of the celebration was not, however, confined to the women, as is shown by frequent references in ancient records, and by Egyptian sculptures representing the union of men and female goats.”

“As was stated before, such rites were performed through a truly devout and religious desire to honor the Deity and win his favor, by imitating the divine act by which life is regenerated and immortalized. Among some of the ancient peoples, this divine generative function was typified by the public union of a man and woman ; a performance which was attended with elaborate religious ceremonies, and constituted the most sacred and most holy feature of their worship.”

“This particular rite is still practiced by some of the phallic-worshiping sects of India, and is to be met with among the natives of some of the Pacific islands. A navigator, writing of one of their religious festivals, says: “ A young man of fine size and perfect proportions performed the creative act with a little miss of eleven or twelve before the assembled congregation, among whom were the leading people of rank of both sexes, without any thought of observing otherwise than an appropriate religious duty.”

“Accounts of many other ceremonies celebrated in honor of the divine procreative function, might be given, but those already cited are sufficient to demonstrate how general and how persistent through all time has been man’s reverence for the immortalizing act of generation, and that in every age and in every country mankind has endeavored to honor and glorify the Author of Life by appropriate religious ceremonies.”

The full breakdown may be found here:

AN EXPOSITION OF THE PHALLIC ORIGIN OF RELIGION

BY CLIFFORD HOWARD THIRD EDITION CHICAGO MEDICAL BOOK

COMPANY CHICAGO 1899 COPYRIGHT BY CLIFFORD HOWARD 1898.

The devils are loose. They are in the public schools, working tirelessly to destroy children, fulfill their perverted rituals and make society except it, pay for it and affirm it. It is up to the parents to say, “NO,” hell no, and remove their children from these esoteric temples of carnal lust, masquerading as “Public Schools.”

Lord have Mercy