The Whole Basis

Traffic Schisms

Most people probably never ever contemplated one of the main reasons that society is so full of “fitnah,” or “mass confusion, corruption, tribulation and violence,” is because of one specific reason, “Owning or operating a motor vehicle upon any of the nation’s roadways.” Period. Think about it? Our society is set up in such a way where most people have to travel by motor vehicle in their daily lives. Regular people, who because of no other reason except operating a motor vehicle, have now become not only a financial target but also prey.

Think about it? Car note. Paid to someone else. Insurance, mostly for nothing, paid to someone else. “Registration,” which means, “surrendered,” also paid to someone else. Drivers License, Real I.D., paid to someone else. All of this so the person can risk their lives on roadways chocked full of violence, mentally ill people, and policing agencies trawling for revenue. All so a person can live a so-called, “free normal life.”

1 in 8 people will make contact with the police in their lifetime, via 41 million traffic citations a year. For most of these people, they will have no other police contact, FOR ANY REASON, the rest of their lives. NO REASON AT ALL EXCEPT THAT THEY CHOOSE TO MOVE ABOUT OR ENGAGE IN COMMERCE FREELY. Think about what that means? That means, “Anytime a person operates, or is a passenger in a vehicle, or walks in public, they are susceptible to be accosted by unsavory characters “acting under color of law.”

“You fit the description of a suspect,” they snicker, “Hands up.”

I mean, traffic stops, and pedestrian stops, have become the “bread and butter” of modern policing in the states united. I mean, most of these “events” are pretext stops “fishing for something else.” The traffic citation is just the “base” compensation for the stop. If the person stopped has “other issues” then the vehicle can be impounded, and in some jurisdictions sold at auction. If there is criminal activity, then that opens a whole different door for revenue generation.

The agencies have become like vampires, sucking the public dry. I mean they are sometimes so full of avarice that they even fight amongst themselves over the traffic stop, as evidenced in many videos available on the internet.

Now, for the legalities of this “Traffic Schism,” I have covered it previously.

In the previous posting it was established that the Separation of Powers, as established in the constitution, makes the whole traffic citation schism unlawful, and at the least, “immoral.” Comprehend that? For generations a “financial schism” has been leveled against the people simply because they exercise their freedom to travel? Now comprehend, that in spite of its manifest “unlawful deficiencies,” that it has been allowed to go on, and with full approval of the local courts. History evidences this fact.

Not being satisfied with my own comprehension, I posed this issue to A.I. That exchange is here:

How many traffic citations are written in the United States annually?

ChatGPT said:

Approximately 41 million traffic citations are issued annually in the United States. This includes a wide range of infractions such as speeding, running red lights, DUIs, and other moving violations.

This figure can vary year to year and by reporting source, but it's commonly cited in law enforcement and traffic safety studies. Would you like a breakdown by violation type or state?

You said:

What is the population of the states united?

ChatGPT said:

As of 2024 estimates, the population of the United States is approximately 335 million people.

This includes all 50 states and the District of Columbia, but not U.S. territories like Puerto Rico or Guam. Would you like a breakdown by state or more recent monthly estimates?

You said:

Based upon the aforementioned, 41 million citations and 335 million people means what?

ChatGPT said:

Based on 41 million traffic citations and a U.S. population of 335 million:

41 million ÷ 335 million ≈ 0.122

That means roughly 12.2% of the U.S. population receives a traffic citation each year, or about 1 in every 8 people.

Of course, some people receive multiple citations, and many receive none—so it’s not evenly distributed. Want help visualizing or interpreting this further?

You said:

What is the number one reason in the United states for police making contact with the public?

ChatGPT said:

The number one reason police make contact with the public in the United States is during traffic stops.

According to data from the U.S. Department of Justice (e.g., the Bureau of Justice Statistics), over 40% of police-public interactions occur during traffic-related stops, making it the most common form of police contact.

Would you like data on what typically follows those stops, such as searches, arrests, or warnings?

You said:

Of the aforementioned traffic stops what race makes up the largest total?

ChatGPT said:

Among traffic stops in the U.S., White drivers make up the largest total number of stops. This is generally consistent with their share of the driving population.

However, when adjusting for population size, Black and Hispanic drivers are disproportionately more likely to be stopped, searched, or ticketed compared to White drivers.

For example, data from the Bureau of Justice Statistics and various state-level studies often show:

• White drivers: highest total number of stops

• Black drivers: more likely to be stopped per capita, and more likely to be searched

• Hispanic drivers: also face elevated stop and search rates compared to Whites

Would you like a chart or data from a specific state or year?

You said:

So whites are stopped the most but searched the least?

ChatGPT said:

Yes, that’s correct:

• White drivers are stopped the most in total numbers, largely because they make up the largest share of drivers in the U.S.

• However, they are searched at lower rates than Black or Hispanic drivers once stopped.

For example, studies including data from the Stanford Open Policing Project and the Bureau of Justice Statistics show that:

• Black and Hispanic drivers are more likely to be searched during a stop than White drivers, even though searches of White drivers are more likely to result in the discovery of contraband.

This disparity has been a central issue in discussions about racial profiling and police reform.

Would you like a visual or state-specific data on this?

You said:

In order to search the driver must be removed from the vehicle, correct?

ChatGPT said:

Not necessarily. A driver does not always need to be removed from the vehicle for a search to occur. Here’s how it breaks down:

1. Types of Searches:

• Consent search: Police ask for permission. The driver may remain in the car.

• Probable cause search: If officers see/smell something illegal (e.g., drugs in plain view or smell marijuana), they can search without removing the driver immediately.

• Search incident to arrest: If the driver is being arrested, the car may be searched, and the driver is typically removed.

• Protective frisk of the vehicle: If an officer believes there is a threat (like a weapon), they can search the car’s immediate area—this may or may not involve removing the driver.

• Inventory search: If the vehicle is impounded, it may be searched regardless of driver location.

2. When Drivers Are Removed:

• Usually done for safety, arrests, or thorough searches, but not required in all cases.

• Officers have legal authority (per Pennsylvania v. Mimms, 1977) to order a driver out of the car during a traffic stop without needing a specific reason.

Would you like a summary of the legal standards for each type of search?

You said:

In order to search the vehicle the driver must be removed, correct?

ChatGPT said:

No, the driver does not have to be removed from the vehicle for police to legally search it.

Here's why:

• Legally, police can search a vehicle with the driver still inside under certain conditions, like:

  • Consent: If the driver agrees, the officer may search without removing them.

  • Probable Cause: If officers see/smell something illegal, they can search without asking the driver to exit.

  • Plain View Doctrine: If illegal items are visible from outside, the vehicle can be searched without removing the driver.

But in practice:

• Officers often remove the driver for safety reasons or to better access the vehicle.

• If the driver is being arrested or the vehicle is being impounded, the driver is almost always removed first.

So, while it’s common, it is not legally required to remove the driver before searching the vehicle.

Would you like a quick reference to court cases that establish these rules?

You said:

Cite one instance where police search a vehicle while occupied?

ChatGPT said:

A real-world example where police searched a vehicle while it was still occupied occurred in the case of United States v. Johns, 469 U.S. 478 (1985). While the core issue of that case focused on the delay in searching a vehicle, it involved agents observing packages in plain view inside a vehicle and inspecting them while the occupants were present.

However, a more routine, day-to-day example (commonly captured on police body cams and dash cams) is during a consent search:

Scenario: An officer pulls a driver over for speeding, notices the smell of marijuana, and asks, "Do you mind if I take a quick look inside the car?"
The driver says yes, remains seated, and the officer begins to search areas within reach (center console, glove box).
This is a legal search with the driver still in the vehicle, often done before deciding to escalate further or ask the driver to step out.

Key point: Officers will typically remove the driver before a full vehicle search, but they are legally allowed to begin or conduct a search while the vehicle is occupied, especially in the case of:

• Consent searches

• Probable cause searches (smell or sight)

• Protective sweeps for weapons

Would you like a video reference or breakdown of how courts handle consent searches?

You said:

So, blacks and Hispanics are more likely to be ticketed and searched compared to whites?

ChatGPT said:

Yes, that is correct.

Based on multiple national studies and law enforcement data:

• Black and Hispanic drivers are more likely to be stopped, ticketed, and searched during traffic stops compared to White drivers, even when controlling for location and type of violation.

• White drivers are searched less frequently, but when they are searched, officers are more likely to find contraband—suggesting a lower threshold is sometimes used to justify searches of Black and Hispanic drivers.

Key sources include:

• Stanford Open Policing Project: Found Black drivers were about 20% more likely to be stopped and 1.5–2 times more likely to be searched than White drivers.

• Bureau of Justice Statistics: Reports consistent disparities in stop outcomes, including higher rates of tickets and searches for Black and Hispanic drivers. (finis)

The whole basis for public enslavement starts in a place that cannot be avoided. Now when this fact is coupled with the modern vehicles being actual surveillance platforms, with cabin microphones and cameras, then the automobile, and roadway travel starts to look more sinister than even. Be careful out there.

Lord have Mercy