Abortion, Eugenics, Or Rituals?

70 MILLION VICTIMS WANT TO KNOW.

“We should hire three or four colored ministers, preferably with social-service backgrounds, and with engaging personalities. The most successful educational approach to the Negro is through a religious appeal. We don’t want the word to go out that we want to exterminate the Negro population. And the minister is the man who can straighten out that idea if it ever occurs to any of their more rebellious members.”

Margaret Sanger’s December 19, 1939 letter to Dr. Clarence Gamble, 255 Adams Street, Milton, Massachusetts. Original source: Sophia Smith Collection, Smith College, North Hampton, Massachusetts.

“Our objective is unlimited sexual gratification without the burden of unwanted children… The most merciful thing that a family does to one of its infant members is to kill it.”

Margaret Sanger (editor). , Volume I, Number 1. Reprinted in Woman and the New Race. New York: Brentanos Publishers, 1922

“Today eugenics is suggested by the most diverse minds as the most adequate and thorough avenue to the solution of racial, political and social problems.”

“I think you must agree… that the campaign for birth control is not merely of eugenic value, but is practically identical with the final aims of eugenics… Birth control propaganda is thus the entering wedge for the eugenic educator.”

“As an advocate of birth control I wish… to point out that the unbalance between the birth rate of the ‘unfit’ and the ‘fit,’ admittedly the greatest present menace to civilization, can never be rectified by the inauguration of a cradle competition between these two classes. In this matter, the example of the inferior classes, the fertility of the feeble-minded, the mentally defective, the poverty stricken classes, should not be held up for emulation.“On the contrary, the most urgent problem today is how to limit and discourage the over-fertility of the mentally and physically defective.”

Margaret Sanger. “The Eugenic Value of Birth Control Propaganda. Birth Control Review, October 1921, page 5

“Our failure to segregate morons who are increasing and multiplying… demonstrates our foolhardy and extravagant sentimentalism…

“Philanthropists encourage the healthier and more normal sections of the world to shoulder the burden of unthinking and indiscriminate fecundity of others; which brings with it, as I think the reader must agree, a dead weight of human waste.

“Instead of decreasing and aiming to eliminate the stocks that are most detrimental to the future of the race and the world, it tends to render them to a menacing degree dominant…

“We are paying for, and even submitting to, the dictates of an ever-increasing, unceasingly spawning class of human beings who never should have been born at all.”

Margaret Sanger. The Pivot of Civilization, 1922, pages 116, 122, and 189. Swarthmore College Library edition

“Birth control must lead ultimately to a cleaner race.” Margaret Sanger. Women Morality and Birth Control New York: New York Publishing Company, 1922, page 12 “One fundamental fact alone, however, indicates the necessity of Birth Control if eugenics is to accomplish its purpose…“Before eugenicists and others who are laboring for racial betterment can succeed, they must first clear the way for Birth Control. Like the advocates of Birth Control, the eugenicists, for instance, are seeking to assist the race toward the elimination of the unfit. Both are seeking a single end but they lay emphasis upon different methods.”Margaret Sanger. “ Birth and Racial Betterment.

“The government ought to “apply a stern and rigid policy of sterilization and segregation to that grade of population whose progeny is tainted, or whose inheritance is such that objectionable traits may be transmitted to offspring.”

“...and the government should “give certain dysgenic groups (those with ‘bad genes’) in our population their choice of segregation or sterilization.”

Margaret Sanger, "A Plan for Peace” Birth Control Review, April 1932, pages 107-108 (emphasis mine).

“The third group [of society] are those irresponsible and reckless ones having little regard for the consequences of their acts, or whose religious scruples prevent their exercising control over their numbers. Many of this group are diseased, feeble-minded, and are of the pauper element dependent upon the normal and fit members of society for their support. There is no doubt in the minds of all thinking people that the procreation of this group should be stopped.”

Margaret Sanger. Speech quoted in "Birth Control, What it is, What it will do.” The Proceedings of the First American Birth Control Conference. Held at the Hotel Plaza, New York City, November 11-12, 1921. Published by the Birth Control Review, pages 172 and 174 (emphasis mine).

“There is only one reply to a request for a higher birthrate among the intelligent, and that is to ask the government to first take the burden of the insane and feeble-minded from your back. [Mandatory] sterilization for these is the answer.” Margaret Sanger, "The Function of Sterilization” Birth Control Review, October 1926.

“In passing, we should here recognize the difficulties presented by the idea of ‘fit’ and ‘unfit.’ Who is to decide this question?

The grosser, the more obvious, the undeniably feeble-minded should, indeed, not only be discouraged but prevented from propagating their kind. But among the writings of the representative Eugenicists cannot ignore the distinct middle-class bias that prevails.”

Margaret Sanger, quoted in Charles Valenza. “Was Margaret Sanger a Racist?” Family Planning Perspectives, January-February 1985, page 44 (emphasis mine).

Birth control: “To create a race of thoroughbreds.”

Margaret Sanger, “Unity” The Birth Control Review, Nov 1921 (emphasis mine).

“Birth Control is not merely an individual problem; it is not merely a national question, it concerns the whole wide world, the ultimate destiny of the human race.

“Hordes of people [are] born, who live, yet who have done absolutely nothing to advance the race one iota. Their lives are hopeless repetitions… Such human weeds clog up the path, drain up the energies and the resources of this little earth. We must clear the way for a better world; we must cultivate our garden.” Margaret Sanger. , 1925

"The most merciful thing that the large family does to one of its infant members is to kill it."

Woman and the New Race, Chapter 5, "The Wickedness of Creating Large Families." (1920)

“I accepted an invitation to talk to the women's branch of the Ku Klux Klan... I was escorted to the platform, was introduced, and began to speak...In the end, through simple illustrations I believed I had accomplished my purpose. A dozen invitations to speak to similar groups were proffered.”
Margaret Sanger, An Autobiography, published in 1938, p. 366

"No woman shall have the legal right to bear a child, and no man shall have the right to become a father, without a permit for parenthood."
Margaret Sanger, "America Needs a Code for Babies," Article 4, March 27, 1934.

"Permits for parenthood shall be issued upon application by city, county, or state authorities to married couples, providing they are financially able to support the expected child, have the qualifications needed for proper rearing of the child, have no transmissible diseases, and, on the woman’s part, no medical indication that maternity is likely to result in death or permanent injury to health."
Margaret Sanger, "America Needs a Code for Babies," Article 5, March 27, 1934.

"Apply a stern and rigid policy of sterilization and segregation to that grade of population whose progeny is tainted, or whose inheritance is such that objectionable traits may be transmitted to offspring." [Basically advocating genocide of the aboriginal and copper colored races of the United States.] italics mines.
Sanger, Margaret. “My Way to Peace,” Jan. 17, 1932. Margaret

Sanger Papers, Library of Congress 130:198.

"We don’t want the word to go out that we want to exterminate the Negro population..."
-- Letter to Dr. Clarence J. Gamble, December 10, 1939, p. 2

Margaret Sanger aligned herself with the eugenicists whose ideology prevailed in the early 20^th century. Eugenicists strongly espoused racial supremacy and "purity"," particularly of the "Aryan" race. Eugenicists hoped to purify the bloodlines and improve the race by encouraging the "fit" to reproduce and the "unfit" to restrict their reproduction. They sought to contain the "inferior" races through segregation, sterilization, birth control and abortion. Sanger embraced Malthusian eugenics. Thomas Robert Malthus, a 19^th century cleric and professor of political economy, believed a population time bomb threatened the existence of the human race. He viewed social problems such as poverty, deprivation and hunger as evidence of this "population crisis." According to writer George Grant, Malthus condemned charities and other forms of benevolence, because he believed they only exacerbated the problems. His answer was to restrict population growth of certain groups of people. His theories of population growth and economic stability became the basis for national and international social policy. Grant quotes from Malthus’ magnum opus, An Essay on the Principle of Population, published in six editions from 1798 to 1826:

All children born, beyond what would be required to keep up the population to a desired level, must necessarily perish, unless room is made for them by the deaths of grown persons. We should facilitate, instead of foolishly and vainly endeavoring to impede, the operations of nature in producing this mortality.

Malthus disciples believed if Western civilization were to survive, the physically unfit, the materially poor, the spiritually diseased, the racially inferior, and the mentally incompetent had to be suppressed and isolated–or even, perhaps, eliminated. His disciples felt the subtler and more "scientific" approaches of education, contraception, sterilization and abortion were more "practical and acceptable ways" to ease the pressures of the alleged overpopulation.

George Grant, Killer Angel (Franklin, Tennessee: Ars Vitae Press, 1995), 50-51.

To be fair to Margaret Sanger, if there is such a thing, I would like to afford Planned Parenthood its hearing:

“Margaret Sanger — Our Founder

A trailblazer in the fight for reproductive rights, Margaret Sanger’s history is layered and complex. Our founder, Margaret Sanger, was a woman of heroic accomplishments, and like all heroes, she was also complex and imperfect. It is undeniable that Margaret Sanger’s lifelong struggle helped 20th century women gain the right to decide when and whether to have a child — a right that had been suppressed worldwide for at least 5,000 years (Boulding, 1992). Anticipating the most recent turn of the millennium, LIFE magazine declared that Margaret Sanger was one of the 100 most important Americans of the 20th Century (LIFE, 1990).”

Planned Parenthood Pamphlet.

“Home to an extensive eugenics movement that crisscrossed the domains of agriculture, education, medicine, and government, California was propitious terrain for the emergence of a far-reaching sterilization regimen. Eugenic ideas were espoused by influential professionals, such as Stanford University Chancellor David Starr Jordan, the Santa Rosa “plant wizard” Luther Burbank, and the Los Angeles politician Dr John R. Haynes. In 1924, Charles M. Goethe, a Sacramento businessman, collaborated with University of California zoologist Samuel J. Holmes to found the Eugenics Section of the San Francisco–based Commonwealth Club of California. Several years later, the agriculturalist and philanthropist Ezra S. Gosney, in consultation with the Eugenics Record Office (located in Cold Spring Harbor, NY), underwrote the Human Betterment Foundation to foment sterilization education and legislation. Gosney eventually selected Paul Popenoe, a date palm cultivator and social hygienist, to conduct a detailed study of sterilization. After collecting data and interviewing patients and staff at state homes and hospitals, he and Gosney coauthored Sterilization for Human Betterment: A Summary of Results of 6000 Operations in California, 1909–1929, which touted the immense value of reproductive surgery and rallied sterilization crusaders across the United States and Europe. This mission was furthered by the activities of the Eugenics Society of Northern California, the California Division of the American Eugenics Society, and the American Institute of Family Relations. In addition to these organizations, California’s sterilization system was buoyed by the administration and involvement of the Department of Institutions, which managed state homes and hospitals, several of which were run by ardent superintendents who devised novel surgical techniques. Because of the state’s multi-faceted eugenics movement and the fact that it appreciably outpaced in absolute terms the other 32 states that passed sterilization laws at some point in the 20th century, California stands out when compared with the rest of the country. California carried out more than twice as many sterilizations as either of its nearest rivals, Virginia (approximately 8000) and North Carolina (approximately 7600). Furthermore, in many states, such as New Jersey and Iowa, sterilization laws were declared unconstitutional, judged to be “cruel and unusual punishment” or in violation of equal protection and due process.In contrast, California’s statute—although reworked over the years—remained in effect without interruption from initial passage until repeal. One of the reasons for this longevity was that, from the outset, California defined sterilization not as a punishment but as a prophylactic measure that could simultaneously defend the public health, preserve precious fiscal resources, and mitigate the menace of the “unfit” and “feeble minded.” California’s prescience was acknowledged in 1927, when the most powerful judiciary in the land, the US Supreme Court, ruled affirmatively on the constitutionality of Virginia’s sterilization statute in Buck v Bell, countenancing sterilization on behalf of the collective health of the citizenry. Shaped by the legal struggles over states’ rights to vaccinate that had played out in the 19th century, and drawing from Jacobson v Massachusetts (1905), which had ruled that maintaining the public health outweighed individual rights when it came to smallpox immunization, Justice Oliver Wendell Holmes wrote in his Buck v Bell opinion: “It is better for the world, if instead of waiting to execute degenerate offspring for crime, or to let them starve for their imbecility, society can prevent those who are manifestly unfit from continuing their kind. The principle that sustains compulsory vaccination is broad enough to cover cutting the Fallopian tubes. Three generations of imbeciles are enough [italics added].” Ezra S. Gosney and Paul Popenoe, Sterilization for Human Betterment: A Summary of Results of

6,000 Operations in California, 1909–1929 (New York: MacMillan, 1929). This was followed 9 years later by Twenty-Eight Years of Sterilization in California (Pasadena, 1938).

Philip R. Reilly, The Surgical Solution: A History of Involuntary Sterilization in the United States (Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1991), chap. 4. Many of these rulings were delivered in the 1910s and prompted state legislatures to reword and resubmit successful sterilization statutes.

See Paul A. Lombardo, “Three Generations, No Imbeciles: New Light on Buck v. Bell,” New York University Law Review 60 (1985): 30–62; on sterilization in Virginia, also see Gregory Michael Dorr, “Segregation’s Science: The American Eugenics Movement and Virginia, 1900–1980,” PhD Dissertation, University of Virginia, 2000.

STERILIZED in the Name of Public Health Race, Immigration, and Reproductive Control in Modern California Alexandra Minna Stern, PhD. Am J Public Health 2005 July.

“Gustave Flaubert's “Salammbô,” Chapter 13 describes how, in desperate attempt to call down rain, the image of Moloch was brought to the center of Carthage, how the arms of the image were moved by the pulling of chains by the priests (apparently Flaubert's own invention), and then describes the sacrifices made to Moloch. First grain and animals of various kinds were placed in compartments within the statue (as in the Rabbinic account). Then the children were offered, at first a few, and then more and more.”

“The brazen arms were working more quickly. They paused no longer. Every time that a child was placed in them the priests of Moloch spread out their hands upon him to burden him with the crimes of the people, vociferating: "They are not men but oxen!" and the multitude round about repeated: "Oxen! oxen!" The devout exclaimed: "Lord! eat!" and the priests of Proserpine, complying through terror with the needs of Carthage, muttered the formula: "Pour out rain! bring forth!"

“The victims, when scarcely at the edge of the opening, disappeared like a drop of water on a red-hot plate, and white smoke rose amid the great scarlet colour.”

“Nevertheless, the appetite of the god was not appeased. He ever wished for more. In order to furnish him with a larger supply, the victims were piled up on his hands with a big chain above them which kept them in their place. Some devout persons had at the beginning wished to count them, to see whether their number corresponded with the days of the solar year; but others were brought, and it was impossible to distinguish them in the giddy motion of the horrible arms. This lasted for a long, indefinite time until the evening. Then the partitions inside assumed a darker glow, and burning flesh could be seen. Some even believed that they could descry hair, limbs, and whole bodies.”

“Night fell; clouds accumulated above the Baal. The funeral-pile, which was flameless now, formed a pyramid of coals up to his knees; completely red like a giant covered with blood, he looked, with his head thrown back, as though he were staggering beneath the weight of his intoxication.”

The madness aforementioned is what real people, evil people are capable of. The strange part of it all is the fact that most of the people, 90%, whining for abortions are foreigners, or the descendants of foreigners to this land. The people clamoring for murder of innocents are not even from the racial group most effected. The majority of children aborted, traditionally, have been American Negro Indians, Brown people and a sprinkle of dirt poor Whites.

So let's recap. Foreigners to this land, or their descendant want abortion for not their own group, but abortion for other racial groups. It sound like they are not asking for abortion, but actually murder. Not the murder of their people, but the murder of the people who don't look like them. Eugenics.

The controllers of these abortion groups, without question, all are made up of the aforementioned foreigners or their descendants. It is not a medical procedure, it is calculated, evil, inter-generational, population control mechanism, coupled with ritual murder.

2 Kings, 17:30-31, “The men of Babylon made Succoth-benoth, the men of Cuth made Nergal, the men of Hamath made Ashima, the Avvites made Nibhaz and Tartak, and the Sepharvites burned their children in the fire to Adrammelech and Anammelech the gods of Sepharvaim.

“In a chapter on " Human Sacrifices," (vol. I, pp. 150-58), M. Menant, to whom we are so much indebted for the classification and interpretation of Oriental cylinders describes the scenes in which a naked man, on one knee and with hands raised in an attitude of fear and supplication, is seized by the "Pontiff," whose right hand is raised to kill him with a weapon. The “Pontiff," thus officiating in a " human sacrifice," he identifies with another of the most frequent figures on the cylinders-that in was a bearded personage, also in a short robe which leaves both leg has one arm hanging down by his side, or a little withdrawn behind him, and holds in his left hand, which is lifted across his waist, a sort of baton. There are slight variations of this figure, such as his holding a basket in his right hand, but the general character is always preserved so as to leave no doubt of his identity.” [Pontiff=Pope]

Notes on Oriental Antiquities. VIII. "Human Sacrifices" on Babylonian Cylinders, William Hayes Ward

The American Journal of Archaeology and of the History of the Fine Arts, Vol. 5, No. 1 (Mar., 1889), pp. 34-43 (10 pages)

https://www.jstor.org/stable/495932

•https://doi.org/10.2307/4959

To believe, for one nanosecond, that motivations towards abortion are honorable, benevolent, or women's health care is just plain naive, simple minded, delusional, disconnected from reality, and a state of denial. No one wants to face the reality. Nothing “normal” in society is as it seems.

70 MILLION SOULS since 1969. Yes souls. In my tradition, the soul is “breathed” into the fetus at 34 days. Again, it is not about anything, except the destruction of the creation of ALL MIGHTY GOD, and the worship of evil, cloaked under the guise of healthcare, brought to this land, the states united, by foreigners!

It just so happens, ahh shucks, just coincidence, that the “creation” being spoken of is mostly our people. Not theirs. Damn.

Lord have Mercy